Theorem bdsepnf 13075

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 13071 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 13076. Use bdsep1 13072 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	|- F/ b ph
bdsepnf.1	|- BOUNDED ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	|- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   a, b, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, a, b)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 |- BOUNDED ph
2	1	bdsepnft 13074	. 2 |- ( A. x F/ b ph -> E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) )
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 |- F/ b ph
4	2, 3	mpg 1427	1 |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1329   F/wnf 1436   E.wex 1468  BOUNDED wbd 12999

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-bdsep 13071

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133

This theorem is referenced by: (None)