Theorem csbiebg 3037

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis x = A -> B = C and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	|- F/_ x C

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   B( x)   C( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable a is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2147	. . . 4 |- ( a = A -> ( x = a <-> x = A ) )
2	1	imbi1d 230	. . 3 |- ( a = A -> ( ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> ( x = A -> B = C ) ) )
3	2	albidv 1796	. 2 |- ( a = A -> ( A. x ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) ) )
4		csbeq1 3001	. . 3 |- ( a = A -> [_ a / x ]_ B = [_ A / x ]_ B )
5	4	eqeq1d 2146	. 2 |- ( a = A -> ( [_ a / x ]_ B = C <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )
6		vex 2684	. . 3 |- a e. _V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 |- F/_ x C
8	6, 7	csbieb 3036	. 2 |- ( A. x ( x = a -> B = C ) <-> [_ a / x ]_ B = C )
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2742	1 |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> B = C ) <-> [_ A / x ]_ B = C ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1329   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   F/_wnfc 2266   [_csb 2998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-csb 2999

This theorem is referenced by: (None)