Theorem dfopab2 6080

Description: A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfopab2	|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }

Distinct variable groups:   ph, z   x, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem dfopab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfsbc1v 2922	. . . . 5 |- F/ x [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph
2	1	19.41 1664	. . . 4 |- ( E. x ( E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
3		sbcopeq1a 6078	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( z = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
4	3	pm5.32i 449	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
5	4	exbii 1584	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) <-> E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) )
6		nfcv 2279	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/_ y ( 1st ` z )
7		nfsbc1v 2922	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph
8	6, 7	nfsbc 2924	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph
9	8	19.41 1664	. . . . . 6 |- ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
10	5, 9	bitr3i 185	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
11	10	exbii 1584	. . . 4 |- ( E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> E. x ( E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
12		elvv 4596	. . . . 5 |- ( z e. ( _V X. _V ) <-> E. x E. y z = <. x , y >. )
13	12	anbi1i 453	. . . 4 |- ( ( z e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) <-> ( E. x E. y z = <. x , y >. /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
14	2, 11, 13	3bitr4i 211	. . 3 |- ( E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) <-> ( z e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) )
15	14	abbii 2253	. 2 |- { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } = { z | ( z e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) }
16		df-opab 3985	. 2 |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z | E. x E. y ( z = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
17		df-rab 2423	. 2 |- { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph } = { z | ( z e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph ) }
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtr4i 2168	1 |- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1331   E.wex 1468   e. wcel 1480   {cab 2123   {crab 2418   _Vcvv 2681   [.wsbc 2904   <.cop 3525   {copab 3983   X. cxp 4532   ` cfv 5118   1stc1st 6029   2ndc2nd 6030

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126  ax-un 4350

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-mpt 3986  df-id 4210  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-iota 5083  df-fun 5120  df-fv 5126  df-1st 6031  df-2nd 6032

This theorem is referenced by: (None)