ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  findes Unicode version

Theorem findes 4352
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
findes.1  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
findes.2  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
Assertion
Ref Expression
findes  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )

Proof of Theorem findes
Dummy variables  y  z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfsbcq2 2819 . 2  |-  ( z  =  (/)  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph 
<-> 
[. (/)  /  x ]. ph ) )
2 sbequ 1762 . 2  |-  ( z  =  y  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
3 dfsbcq2 2819 . 2  |-  ( z  =  suc  y  -> 
( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
4 sbequ12r 1696 . 2  |-  ( z  =  x  ->  ( [ z  /  x ] ph  <->  ph ) )
5 findes.1 . 2  |-  [. (/)  /  x ]. ph
6 nfv 1462 . . . 4  |-  F/ x  y  e.  om
7 nfs1v 1857 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [ y  /  x ] ph
8 nfsbc1v 2834 . . . . 5  |-  F/ x [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph
97, 8nfim 1505 . . . 4  |-  F/ x
( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
106, 9nfim 1505 . . 3  |-  F/ x
( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
11 eleq1 2142 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
x  e.  om  <->  y  e.  om ) )
12 sbequ12 1695 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph 
<->  [ y  /  x ] ph ) )
13 suceq 4165 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  suc  x  =  suc  y )
14 dfsbcq 2818 . . . . . 6  |-  ( suc  x  =  suc  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
1513, 14syl 14 . . . . 5  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  ( [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph  <->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) )
1612, 15imbi12d 232 . . . 4  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )  <->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
) )
1711, 16imbi12d 232 . . 3  |-  ( x  =  y  ->  (
( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph )
)  <->  ( y  e. 
om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph ) ) ) )
18 findes.2 . . 3  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ( ph  ->  [. suc  x  /  x ]. ph ) )
1910, 17, 18chvar 1681 . 2  |-  ( y  e.  om  ->  ( [ y  /  x ] ph  ->  [. suc  y  /  x ]. ph )
)
201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19finds 4349 1  |-  ( x  e.  om  ->  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 103    = wceq 1285    e. wcel 1434   [wsb 1686   [.wsbc 2816   (/)c0 3258   suc csuc 4128   omcom 4339
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-13 1445  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-sep 3904  ax-nul 3912  ax-pow 3956  ax-pr 3972  ax-un 4196  ax-iinf 4337
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-ral 2354  df-rex 2355  df-v 2604  df-sbc 2817  df-dif 2976  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-nul 3259  df-pw 3392  df-sn 3412  df-pr 3413  df-uni 3610  df-int 3645  df-suc 4134  df-iom 4340
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator