ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  isarep2 Unicode version

Theorem isarep2 5017
Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature " [ i, 
[ i, i  ] => o  ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5015. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
isarep2.1  |-  A  e. 
_V
isarep2.2  |-  A. x  e.  A  A. y A. z ( ( ph  /\ 
[ z  /  y ] ph )  ->  y  =  z )
Assertion
Ref Expression
isarep2  |-  E. w  w  =  ( { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } " A
)
Distinct variable groups:    x, w, y, A    y, z    ph, w    ph, z
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( x, y)    A( z)

Proof of Theorem isarep2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resima 4671 . . . 4  |-  ( ( { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ph }  |`  A )
" A )  =  ( { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } " A )
2 resopab 4682 . . . . 5  |-  ( {
<. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  |`  A )  =  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }
32imaeq1i 4695 . . . 4  |-  ( ( { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ph }  |`  A )
" A )  =  ( { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) } " A
)
41, 3eqtr3i 2104 . . 3  |-  ( {
<. x ,  y >.  |  ph } " A
)  =  ( {
<. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) } " A )
5 funopab 4965 . . . . 5  |-  ( Fun 
{ <. x ,  y
>.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) } 
<-> 
A. x E* y
( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) )
6 isarep2.2 . . . . . . . 8  |-  A. x  e.  A  A. y A. z ( ( ph  /\ 
[ z  /  y ] ph )  ->  y  =  z )
76rspec 2416 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( x  e.  A  ->  A. y A. z ( ( ph  /\ 
[ z  /  y ] ph )  ->  y  =  z ) )
8 nfv 1462 . . . . . . . 8  |-  F/ z
ph
98mo3 1996 . . . . . . 7  |-  ( E* y ph  <->  A. y A. z ( ( ph  /\ 
[ z  /  y ] ph )  ->  y  =  z ) )
107, 9sylibr 132 . . . . . 6  |-  ( x  e.  A  ->  E* y ph )
11 moanimv 2017 . . . . . 6  |-  ( E* y ( x  e.  A  /\  ph )  <->  ( x  e.  A  ->  E* y ph ) )
1210, 11mpbir 144 . . . . 5  |-  E* y
( x  e.  A  /\  ph )
135, 12mpgbir 1383 . . . 4  |-  Fun  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }
14 isarep2.1 . . . . 5  |-  A  e. 
_V
1514funimaex 5015 . . . 4  |-  ( Fun 
{ <. x ,  y
>.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) }  ->  ( { <. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) } " A
)  e.  _V )
1613, 15ax-mp 7 . . 3  |-  ( {
<. x ,  y >.  |  ( x  e.  A  /\  ph ) } " A )  e. 
_V
174, 16eqeltri 2152 . 2  |-  ( {
<. x ,  y >.  |  ph } " A
)  e.  _V
1817isseti 2608 1  |-  E. w  w  =  ( { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph } " A
)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    -> wi 4    /\ wa 102   A.wal 1283    = wceq 1285   E.wex 1422    e. wcel 1434   [wsb 1686   E*wmo 1943   A.wral 2349   _Vcvv 2602   {copab 3846    |` cres 4373   "cima 4374   Fun wfun 4926
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-coll 3901  ax-sep 3904  ax-pow 3956  ax-pr 3972
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-eu 1945  df-mo 1946  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-ral 2354  df-rex 2355  df-v 2604  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-pw 3392  df-sn 3412  df-pr 3413  df-op 3415  df-br 3794  df-opab 3848  df-id 4056  df-xp 4377  df-rel 4378  df-cnv 4379  df-co 4380  df-dm 4381  df-rn 4382  df-res 4383  df-ima 4384  df-fun 4934
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator