P. 29 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2801-2900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rspc2gv 2801*	Restricted specialization with two quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)
|- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x e. V A. y e. W ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc2v 2802*	2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( A. x e. C A. y e. D ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc2va 2803*	2-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ A. x e. C A. y e. D ph ) -> ps )
Theorem	rspc2ev 2804*	2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ ps ) -> E. x e. C E. y e. D ph )
Theorem	rspc3v 2805*	3-variable restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( th <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) -> ( A. x e. R A. y e. S A. z e. T ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	rspc3ev 2806*	3-variable restricted existentional specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = C -> ( th <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. R /\ B e. S /\ C e. T ) /\ ps ) -> E. x e. R E. y e. S E. z e. T ph )
Theorem	rspceeqv 2807*	Restricted existential specialization in an equality, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Sep-2022.)
|- ( x = A -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ E = D ) -> E. x e. B E = C )
Theorem	eqvinc 2808*	A variable introduction law for class equality. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B <-> E. x ( x = A /\ x = B ) )
Theorem	eqvincg 2809*	A variable introduction law for class equality, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2017.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B <-> E. x ( x = A /\ x = B ) ) )
Theorem	eqvincf 2810	A variable introduction law for class equality, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B <-> E. x ( x = A /\ x = B ) )
Theorem	alexeq 2811*	Two ways to express substitution of A for x in ph. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	ceqex 2812*	Equality implies equivalence with substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	ceqsexg 2813*	A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsexgv 2814*	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrexv 2815*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrexbv 2816*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Mar-2014.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. B ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	ceqsrex2v 2817*	Elimination of a restricted existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( E. x e. C E. y e. D ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) /\ ph ) <-> ch ) )
Theorem	clel2 2818*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> A. x ( x = A -> x e. B ) )
Theorem	clel3g 2819*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2005.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. B <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A e. x ) ) )
Theorem	clel3 2820*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A e. x ) )
Theorem	clel4 2821*	An alternate definition of class membership when the class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> A. x ( x = B -> A e. x ) )
Theorem	pm13.183 2822*	Compare theorem *13.183 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. Only A is required to be a set. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B <-> A. z ( z = A <-> z = B ) ) )
Theorem	rr19.3v 2823*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.3 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2012.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ph <-> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rr19.28v 2824*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2012.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> A. x e. A ( ph /\ A. y e. A ps ) )
Theorem	elabgt 2825*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elabg 2830.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elabgf 2826	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elabf 2827*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elab 2828*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elabd 2829*	Explicit demonstration the class { x | ps } is not empty by the example X. (Contributed by RP, 12-Aug-2020.)
|- ( ph -> X e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( x = X -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )
Theorem	elabg 2830*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab2g 2831*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A e. B <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab2 2832*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> ps )
Theorem	elab4g 2833*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- B = { x | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. B <-> ( A e. _V /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elab3gf 2834	Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabgf 2826. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab3g 2835*	Membership in a class abstraction, with a weaker antecedent than elabg 2830. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ps -> A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elab3 2836*	Membership in a class abstraction using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2000.)
|- ( ps -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x | ph } <-> ps )
Theorem	elrabi 2837*	Implication for the membership in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A e. { x e. V | ph } -> A e. V )
Theorem	elrabf 2838	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elrab3t 2839*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 2841.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)
|- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elrab 2840*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1999.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	elrab3 2841*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )
Theorem	elrabd 2842*	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. Deduction version of elrab 2840. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. { x e. B | ps } )
Theorem	elrab2 2843*	Membership in a class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- C = { x e. B | ph }   =>    |- ( A e. C <-> ( A e. B /\ ps ) )
Theorem	ralab 2844*	Universal quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y | ph } ch <-> A. x ( ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	ralrab 2845*	Universal quantification over a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y e. A | ph } ch <-> A. x e. A ( ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	rexab 2846*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y | ph } ch <-> E. x ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexrab 2847*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( y = x -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y e. A | ph } ch <-> E. x e. A ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	ralab2 2848*	Universal quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y | ph } ps <-> A. y ( ph -> ch ) )
Theorem	ralrab2 2849*	Universal quantification over a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { y e. A | ph } ps <-> A. y e. A ( ph -> ch ) )
Theorem	rexab2 2850*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y | ph } ps <-> E. y ( ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexrab2 2851*	Existential quantification over a class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { y e. A | ph } ps <-> E. y e. A ( ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	abidnf 2852*	Identity used to create closed-form versions of bound-variable hypothesis builders for class expressions. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( F/_ x A -> { z | A. x z e. A } = A )
Theorem	dedhb 2853*	A deduction theorem for converting the inference |- F/_ x A => |- ph into a closed theorem. Use nfa1 1521 and nfab 2286 to eliminate the hypothesis of the substitution instance ps of the inference. For converting the inference form into a deduction form, abidnf 2852 is useful. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.)
|- ( A = { z | A. x z e. A } -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ps   =>    |- ( F/_ x A -> ph )
Theorem	eqeu 2854*	A condition which implies existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 8-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ ps /\ A. x ( ph -> x = A ) ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	eueq 2855*	Equality has existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> E! x x = A )
Theorem	eueq1 2856*	Equality has existential uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- E! x x = A
Theorem	eueq2dc 2857*	Equality has existential uniqueness (split into 2 cases). (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- (DECID ph -> E! x ( ( ph /\ x = A ) \/ ( -. ph /\ x = B ) ) )
Theorem	eueq3dc 2858*	Equality has existential uniqueness (split into 3 cases). (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 28-Sep-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- -. ( ph /\ ps )   =>    |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> E! x ( ( ph /\ x = A ) \/ ( -. ( ph \/ ps ) /\ x = B ) \/ ( ps /\ x = C ) ) ) )
Theorem	moeq 2859*	There is at most one set equal to a class. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.)
|- E* x x = A
Theorem	moeq3dc 2860*	"At most one" property of equality (split into 3 cases). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jul-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- -. ( ph /\ ps )   =>    |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> E* x ( ( ph /\ x = A ) \/ ( -. ( ph \/ ps ) /\ x = B ) \/ ( ps /\ x = C ) ) ) )
Theorem	mosubt 2861*	"At most one" remains true after substitution. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A. y E* x ph -> E* x E. y ( y = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	mosub 2862*	"At most one" remains true after substitution. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
|- E* x ph   =>    |- E* x E. y ( y = A /\ ph )
Theorem	mo2icl 2863*	Theorem for inferring "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
|- ( A. x ( ph -> x = A ) -> E* x ph )
Theorem	mob2 2864*	Consequence of "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. B /\ E* x ph /\ ph ) -> ( x = A <-> ps ) )
Theorem	moi2 2865*	Consequence of "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2008.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. B /\ E* x ph ) /\ ( ph /\ ps ) ) -> x = A )
Theorem	mob 2866*	Equality implied by "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ E* x ph /\ ps ) -> ( A = B <-> ch ) )
Theorem	moi 2867*	Equality implied by "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2006.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) /\ E* x ph /\ ( ps /\ ch ) ) -> A = B )
Theorem	morex 2868*	Derive membership from uniqueness. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( E. x e. A ph /\ E* x ph ) -> ( ps -> B e. A ) )
Theorem	euxfr2dc 2869*	Transfer existential uniqueness from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- E* y x = A   =>    |- (DECID E. y E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ( E! x E. y ( x = A /\ ph ) <-> E! y ph ) )
Theorem	euxfrdc 2870*	Transfer existential uniqueness from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- E! y x = A   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- (DECID E. y E. x ( x = A /\ ps ) -> ( E! x ph <-> E! y ps ) )
Theorem	euind 2871*	Existential uniqueness via an indirect equality. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2010.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> A = B ) /\ E. x ph ) -> E! z A. x ( ph -> z = A ) )
Theorem	reu2 2872*	A way to express restricted uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	reu6 2873*	A way to express restricted uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2006.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A A. x e. A ( ph <-> x = y ) )
Theorem	reu3 2874*	A way to express restricted uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. A A. x e. A ( ph -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	reu6i 2875*	A condition which implies existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
|- ( ( B e. A /\ A. x e. A ( ph <-> x = B ) ) -> E! x e. A ph )
Theorem	eqreu 2876*	A condition which implies existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
|- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ ps /\ A. x e. A ( ph -> x = B ) ) -> E! x e. A ph )
Theorem	rmo4 2877*	Restricted "at most one" using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> x = y ) )
Theorem	reu4 2878*	Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	reu7 2879*	Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. x e. A A. y e. A ( ps -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	reu8 2880*	Restricted uniqueness using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. x e. A ( ph /\ A. y e. A ( ps -> x = y ) ) )
Theorem	rmo3f 2881*	Restricted "at most one" using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ( ph /\ [ y / x ] ph ) -> x = y ) )
Theorem	rmo4f 2882*	Restricted "at most one" using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> A. x e. A A. y e. A ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> x = y ) )
Theorem	reueq 2883*	Equality has existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
|- ( B e. A <-> E! x e. A x = B )
Theorem	rmoan 2884	Restricted "at most one" still holds when a conjunct is added. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ( ps /\ ph ) )
Theorem	rmoim 2885	Restricted "at most one" is preserved through implication (note wff reversal). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( E* x e. A ps -> E* x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	rmoimia 2886	Restricted "at most one" is preserved through implication (note wff reversal). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ps -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	rmoimi2 2887	Restricted "at most one" is preserved through implication (note wff reversal). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. B /\ ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. B ps -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	2reuswapdc 2888*	A condition allowing swap of uniqueness and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2017.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- (DECID E. x E. y ( x e. A /\ ( y e. B /\ ph ) ) -> ( A. x e. A E* y e. B ph -> ( E! x e. A E. y e. B ph -> E! y e. B E. x e. A ph ) ) )
Theorem	reuind 2889*	Existential uniqueness via an indirect equality. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2010.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y ( ( ( A e. C /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. C /\ ps ) ) -> A = B ) /\ E. x ( A e. C /\ ph ) ) -> E! z e. C A. x ( ( A e. C /\ ph ) -> z = A ) )
Theorem	2rmorex 2890*	Double restricted quantification with "at most one," analogous to 2moex 2085. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. A E. y e. B ph -> A. y e. B E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	nelrdva 2891*	Deduce negative membership from an implication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> x =/= B )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. B e. A )
2.1.7  Conditional equality (experimental) This is a very useless definition, which "abbreviates" ( x = y -> ph ) as CondEq ( x = y -> ph ). What this display hides, though, is that the first expression, even though it has a shorter constant string, is actually much more complicated in its parse tree: it is parsed as (wi (wceq (cv vx) (cv vy)) wph), while the CondEq version is parsed as (wcdeq vx vy wph). It also allows us to give a name to the specific ternary operation ( x = y -> ph ). This is all used as part of a metatheorem: we want to say that |- ( x = y -> ( ph ( x ) <-> ph ( y ) ) ) and |- ( x = y -> A ( x ) = A ( y ) ) are provable, for any expressions ph ( x ) or A ( x ) in the language. The proof is by induction, so the base case is each of the primitives, which is why you will see a theorem for each of the set.mm primitive operations. The metatheorem comes with a disjoint variables condition: every variable in ph ( x ) is assumed disjoint from x except x itself. For such a proof by induction, we must consider each of the possible forms of ph ( x ). If it is a variable other than x, then we have CondEq ( x = y -> A = A ) or CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ph ) ), which is provable by cdeqth 2896 and reflexivity. Since we are only working with class and wff expressions, it can't be x itself in set.mm, but if it was we'd have to also prove CondEq ( x = y -> x = y ) (where set equality is being used on the right). Otherwise, it is a primitive operation applied to smaller expressions. In these cases, for each setvar variable parameter to the operation, we must consider if it is equal to x or not, which yields 2^n proof obligations. Luckily, all primitive operations in set.mm have either zero or one set variable, so we only need to prove one statement for the non-set constructors (like implication) and two for the constructors taking a set (the forall and the class builder). In each of the primitive proofs, we are allowed to assume that y is disjoint from ph ( x ) and vice versa, because this is maintained through the induction. This is how we satisfy the disjoint variable conditions of cdeqab1 2901 and cdeqab 2899.
Syntax	wcdeq 2892	Extend wff notation to include conditional equality. This is a technical device used in the proof that F/ is the not-free predicate, and that definitions are conservative as a result.
wff CondEq ( x = y -> ph )
Definition	df-cdeq 2893	Define conditional equality. All the notation to the left of the <-> is fake; the parentheses and arrows are all part of the notation, which could equally well be written CondEq x y ph. On the right side is the actual implication arrow. The reason for this definition is to "flatten" the structure on the right side (whose tree structure is something like (wi (wceq (cv vx) (cv vy)) wph) ) into just (wcdeq vx vy wph). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- (CondEq ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	cdeqi 2894	Deduce conditional equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( x = y -> ph )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ph )
Theorem	cdeqri 2895	Property of conditional equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ph )   =>    |- ( x = y -> ph )
Theorem	cdeqth 2896	Deduce conditional equality from a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ph   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ph )
Theorem	cdeqnot 2897	Distribute conditional equality over negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( -. ph <-> -. ps ) )
Theorem	cdeqal 2898*	Distribute conditional equality over quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A. z ph <-> A. z ps ) )
Theorem	cdeqab 2899*	Distribute conditional equality over abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> { z | ph } = { z | ps } )
Theorem	cdeqal1 2900*	Distribute conditional equality over quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps ) )