P. 35 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elelpwi 3401	If A belongs to a part of C then A belongs to C. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ B e. ~P C ) -> A e. C )
Theorem	nfpw 3402	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for power class. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x ~P A
Theorem	pwidg 3403	Membership of the original in a power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. ~P A )
Theorem	pwid 3404	A set is a member of its power class. Theorem 87 of [Suppes] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. ~P A
Theorem	pwss 3405*	Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
|- ( ~P A C_ B <-> A. x ( x C_ A -> x e. B ) )
2.1.17  Unordered and ordered pairs
Syntax	csn 3406	Extend class notation to include singleton.
class { A }
Syntax	cpr 3407	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class { A , B }
Syntax	ctp 3408	Extend class notation to include unordered triplet.
class { A , B , C }
Syntax	cop 3409	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class <. A , B >.
Syntax	cotp 3410	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class <. A , B , C >.
Theorem	snjust 3411*	Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3412. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- { x | x = A } = { y | y = A }
Definition	df-sn 3412*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of _V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3420. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A } = { x | x = A }
Definition	df-pr 3413	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so { A , B } = { B , A } as proven by prcom 3476. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3425. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = ( { A } u. { B } )
Definition	df-tp 3414	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A , B } u. { C } )
Definition	df-op 3415*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition { { A } , { A , B } } when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3600 and opprc2 3601). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3577. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as <. A , B >. = { { A } , { A , B } }, which has different behavior from our df-op 3415 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3415 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition <. A , B >._2 = { { { A } , (/) } , { { B } } }. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is <. A , B >._3 = { A , { A , B } }, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B >. = { x | ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V /\ x e. { { A } , { A , B } } ) }
Definition	df-ot 3416	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B , C >. = <. <. A , B >. , C >.
Theorem	sneq 3417	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	sneqi 3418	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A } = { B }
Theorem	sneqd 3419	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	dfsn2 3420	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A } = { A , A }
Theorem	elsng 3421	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn 3422	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	velsn 3423	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
Theorem	elsni 3424	There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. { B } -> A = B )
Theorem	dfpr2 3425*	Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B ) }
Theorem	elprg 3426	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) ) )
Theorem	elpr 3427	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpr2 3428	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpri 3429	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
|- ( A e. { B , C } -> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	nelpri 3430	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- -. A e. { B , C }
Theorem	snidg 3431	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snidb 3432	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snid 3433	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. { A }
Theorem	vsnid 3434	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- x e. { x }
Theorem	elsn2g 3435	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn2 3436	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	mosn 3437*	A singleton has at most one element. This works whether A is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3516 and snprc 3465. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.)
|- E* x x e. { A }
Theorem	ralsnsg 3438*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	ralsns 3439*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	rexsns 3440*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	ralsng 3441*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	rexsng 3442*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	exsnrex 3443	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
|- ( E. x M = { x } <-> E. x e. M M = { x } )
Theorem	ralsn 3444*	Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	rexsn 3445*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	eltpg 3446	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) ) )
Theorem	eltpi 3447	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. { B , C , D } -> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	eltp 3448	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	dftp2 3449*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B \/ x = C ) }
Theorem	nfpr 3450	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x { A , B }
Theorem	ralprg 3451*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	rexprg 3452*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) )
Theorem	raltpg 3453*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) )
Theorem	rextpg 3454*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) ) )
Theorem	ralpr 3455*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexpr 3456*	Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) )
Theorem	raltp 3457*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )
Theorem	rextp 3458*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) )
Theorem	sbcsng 3459*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	nfsn 3460	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { A }
Theorem	csbsng 3461	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ { B } = { [_ A / x ]_ B } )
Theorem	disjsn 3462	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( A i^i { B } ) = (/) <-> -. B e. A )
Theorem	disjsn2 3463	Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( A =/= B -> ( { A } i^i { B } ) = (/) )
Theorem	disjpr2 3464	The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( A =/= C /\ B =/= C ) /\ ( A =/= D /\ B =/= D ) ) -> ( { A , B } i^i { C , D } ) = (/) )
Theorem	snprc 3465	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A e. _V <-> { A } = (/) )
Theorem	r19.12sn 3466*	Special case of r19.12 2467 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B E. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	rabsn 3467*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.)
|- ( B e. A -> { x e. A | x = B } = { B } )
Theorem	rabrsndc 3468*	A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- DECID ph   =>    |- ( M = { x e. { A } | ph } -> ( M = (/) \/ M = { A } ) )
Theorem	euabsn2 3469*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. y { x | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	euabsn 3470	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. x { x | ph } = { x } )
Theorem	reusn 3471*	A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. y { x e. A | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	absneu 3472	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	rabsneu 3473	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x e. B | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x e. B ph )
Theorem	eusn 3474*	Two ways to express " A is a singleton." (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.)
|- ( E! x x e. A <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	rabsnt 3475*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( { x e. A | ph } = { B } -> ps )
Theorem	prcom 3476	Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = { B , A }
Theorem	preq1 3477	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2 3478	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12 3479	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ( A = C /\ B = D ) -> { A , B } = { C , D } )
Theorem	preq1i 3480	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , C }
Theorem	preq2i 3481	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { C , A } = { C , B }
Theorem	preq12i 3482	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , D }
Theorem	preq1d 3483	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2d 3484	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12d 3485	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq1 3486	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2 3487	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3 3488	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq1d 3489	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2d 3490	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3d 3491	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq123d 3492	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   &    |- ( ph -> E = F )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , E } = { B , D , F } )
Theorem	tprot 3493	Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
|- { A , B , C } = { B , C , A }
Theorem	tpcoma 3494	Swap 1st and 2nd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , C } = { B , A , C }
Theorem	tpcomb 3495	Swap 2nd and 3rd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , C } = { A , C , B }
Theorem	tpass 3496	Split off the first element of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A } u. { B , C } )
Theorem	qdass 3497	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- ( { A , B } u. { C , D } ) = ( { A , B , C } u. { D } )
Theorem	qdassr 3498	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- ( { A , B } u. { C , D } ) = ( { A } u. { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpidm12 3499	Unordered triple { A , A , B } is just an overlong way to write { A , B }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , A , B } = { A , B }
Theorem	tpidm13 3500	Unordered triple { A , B , A } is just an overlong way to write { A , B }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , A } = { A , B }