P. 61 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6001-6100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
2.6.13  Functions (continued)
Theorem	resfunexgALT 6001	The restriction of a function to a set exists. Compare Proposition 6.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This version has a shorter proof than resfunexg 5634 but requires ax-pow 4093 and ax-un 4350. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A |` B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunexg 6002	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( Fun A /\ B e. C ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	cofunex2g 6003	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ Fun `' B ) -> ( A o. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnexALT 6004	If the domain of a function is a set, the function is a set. Theorem 6.16(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 28. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 5202. This version of fnex 5635 uses ax-pow 4093 and ax-un 4350, whereas fnex 5635 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( F Fn A /\ A e. B ) -> F e. _V )
Theorem	funrnex 6005	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 5636. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
|- ( dom F e. B -> ( Fun F -> ran F e. _V ) )
Theorem	fornex 6006	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A e. C -> ( F : A -onto-> B -> B e. _V ) )
Theorem	f1dmex 6007	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This can be thought of as a form of the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex 6008*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be thought of as B ( x ). This simple-looking theorem is actually quite powerful and appears to involve the Axiom of Replacement in an intrinsic way, as can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 5638, funex 5636, fnex 5635, resfunexg 5634, and funimaexg 5202. See also abrexex2 6015. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V
Theorem	abrexexg 6009*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. The antecedent assures us that A is a set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> { y | E. x e. A y = B } e. _V )
Theorem	iunexg 6010*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A B e. W ) -> U_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	abrexex2g 6011*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A { y | ph } e. W ) -> { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3d 6012*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> { y | ps } e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } e. _V )
Theorem	opabex3 6013*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> { y | ph } e. _V )   =>    |- { <. x , y >. | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	iunex 6014*	The existence of an indexed union. x is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for B, which can be read informally as B ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- U_ x e. A B e. _V
Theorem	abrexex2 6015*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph is normally has free-variable parameters x and y. See also abrexex 6008. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	abexssex 6016*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both x and y can be free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ( x C_ A /\ ph ) } e. _V
Theorem	abexex 6017*	A condition where a class builder continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> x e. A )   &    |- { y | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { y | E. x ph } e. _V
Theorem	oprabexd 6018*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) -> E* z ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) } )   =>    |- ( ph -> F e. _V )
Theorem	oprabex 6019*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> E* z ph )   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabex3 6020*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
|- H e. _V   &    |- F = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( H X. H ) /\ y e. ( H X. H ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = R ) ) }   =>    |- F e. _V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 6021*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. w e. A ph } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex 6022*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables x and y are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for C, which can be thought of as C ( x , y ). See comments for abrexex 6008. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B z = C } e. _V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 6023*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. ph normally has free-variable parameters x, y, and z. Compare abrexex2 6015. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- { z | ph } e. _V   =>    |- { z | E. x e. A E. y e. B ph } e. _V
Theorem	xpexgALT 6024	The cross product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. This version is proven using Replacement; see xpexg 4648 for a version that uses the Power Set axiom instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A X. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	offval3 6025*	General value of ( F oF R G ) with no assumptions on functionality of F and G. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( F oF R G ) = ( x e. ( dom F i^i dom G ) |-> ( ( F ` x ) R ( G ` x ) ) ) )
Theorem	offres 6026	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ G e. W ) -> ( ( F oF R G ) |` D ) = ( ( F |` D ) oF R ( G |` D ) ) )
Theorem	ofmres 6027*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike oF R which is a proper class, ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) can be a set by ofmresex 6028, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 5986, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for oF R to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( f e. A , g e. B |-> ( f oF R g ) )
Theorem	ofmresex 6028	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( oF R |` ( A X. B ) ) e. _V )
2.6.14  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 6029	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 6030	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 6031	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 6037 proves that it does this. For example, ( 1st ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 5015 and op1stb 4394). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 1st = ( x e. _V |-> U. dom { x } )
Definition	df-2nd 6032	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 6038 proves that it does this. For example, ( 2nd ` <. 3 , 4 >.) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 5018 and op2ndb 5017). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- 2nd = ( x e. _V |-> U. ran { x } )
Theorem	1stvalg 6033	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 1st ` A ) = U. dom { A } )
Theorem	2ndvalg 6034	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. _V -> ( 2nd ` A ) = U. ran { A } )
Theorem	1st0 6035	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 1st ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	2nd0 6036	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|- ( 2nd ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	op1st 6037	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A
Theorem	op2nd 6038	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B
Theorem	op1std 6039	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 1st ` C ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndd 6040	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( C = <. A , B >. -> ( 2nd ` C ) = B )
Theorem	op1stg 6041	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 1st ` <. A , B >. ) = A )
Theorem	op2ndg 6042	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B >. ) = B )
Theorem	ot1stg 6043	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6043, ot2ndg 6044, ot3rdgg 6045.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 1st ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = A )
Theorem	ot2ndg 6044	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6043 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` <. A , B , C >. ) ) = B )
Theorem	ot3rdgg 6045	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6043 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( 2nd ` <. A , B , C >. ) = C )
Theorem	1stval2 6046	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 1st ` A ) = |^| |^| A )
Theorem	2ndval2 6047	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) = |^| |^| |^| `' { A } )
Theorem	fo1st 6048	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 1st : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	fo2nd 6049	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- 2nd : _V -onto-> _V
Theorem	f1stres 6050	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> A
Theorem	f2ndres 6051	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|- ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) --> B
Theorem	fo1stresm 6052*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. y y e. B -> ( 1st |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> A )
Theorem	fo2ndresm 6053*	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|- ( E. x x e. A -> ( 2nd |` ( A X. B ) ) : ( A X. B ) -onto-> B )
Theorem	1stcof 6054	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st o. F ) : A --> B )
Theorem	2ndcof 6055	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|- ( F : A --> ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd o. F ) : A --> C )
Theorem	xp1st 6056	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. B )
Theorem	xp2nd 6057	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. C )
Theorem	1stexg 6058	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 1st ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	2ndexg 6059	Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jan-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. _V )
Theorem	elxp6 6060	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5021. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	elxp7 6061	Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 5021. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) e. B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) e. C ) ) )
Theorem	oprssdmm 6062*	Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.)
|- ( ( ph /\ u e. S ) -> E. v v e. u )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x F y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> Rel F )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S X. S ) C_ dom F )
Theorem	eqopi 6063	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. ( V X. W ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) -> A = <. B , C >. )
Theorem	xp2 6064*	Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A X. B ) = { x e. ( _V X. _V ) | ( ( 1st ` x ) e. A /\ ( 2nd ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	unielxp 6065	The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. A e. U. ( B X. C ) )
Theorem	1st2nd2 6066	Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	xpopth 6067	An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. ( C X. D ) /\ B e. ( R X. S ) ) -> ( ( ( 1st ` A ) = ( 1st ` B ) /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = ( 2nd ` B ) ) <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	eqop 6068	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	eqop2 6069	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> ( A e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ( ( 1st ` A ) = B /\ ( 2nd ` A ) = C ) ) )
Theorem	op1steq 6070*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( V X. W ) -> ( ( 1st ` A ) = B <-> E. x A = <. B , x >. ) )
Theorem	2nd1st 6071	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|- ( A e. ( B X. C ) -> U. `' { A } = <. ( 2nd ` A ) , ( 1st ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1st2nd 6072	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> A = <. ( 1st ` A ) , ( 2nd ` A ) >. )
Theorem	1stdm 6073	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 1st ` A ) e. dom R )
Theorem	2ndrn 6074	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( Rel R /\ A e. R ) -> ( 2nd ` A ) e. ran R )
Theorem	1st2ndbr 6075	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( Rel B /\ A e. B ) -> ( 1st ` A ) B ( 2nd ` A ) )
Theorem	releldm2 6076*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> ( B e. dom A <-> E. x e. A ( 1st ` x ) = B ) )
Theorem	reldm 6077*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|- ( Rel A -> dom A = ran ( x e. A |-> ( 1st ` x ) ) )
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 6078	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 2913 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4161). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> ( [. ( 1st ` A ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	csbopeq1a 6079	Equality theorem for substitution of a class A for an ordered pair <. x , y >. in B (analog of csbeq1a 3007). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( A = <. x , y >. -> [_ ( 1st ` A ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` A ) / y ]_ B = B )
Theorem	dfopab2 6080*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. x , y >. | ph } = { z e. ( _V X. _V ) | [. ( 1st ` z ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]. ph }
Theorem	dfoprab3s 6081*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ [. ( 1st ` w ) / x ]. [. ( 2nd ` w ) / y ]. ph ) }
Theorem	dfoprab3 6082*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( _V X. _V ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps }
Theorem	dfoprab4 6083*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfoprab4f 6084*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }
Theorem	dfxp3 6085*	Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4540. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|- ( ( A X. B ) X. C ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( x e. A /\ y e. B /\ z e. C ) }
Theorem	elopabi 6086*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` A ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. x , y >. | ph } -> ch )
Theorem	eloprabi 6087*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|- ( x = ( 1st ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = ( 2nd ` ( 1st ` A ) ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( z = ( 2nd ` A ) -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A e. { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } -> th )
Theorem	mpomptsx 6088*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	mpompts 6089*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|- ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C ) = ( z e. ( A X. B ) |-> [_ ( 1st ` z ) / x ]_ [_ ( 2nd ` z ) / y ]_ C )
Theorem	dmmpossx 6090*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- dom F C_ U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B )
Theorem	fmpox 6091*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where B ( x ) is not constant but depends on x. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : U_ x e. A ( { x } X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fmpo 6092*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. D <-> F : ( A X. B ) --> D )
Theorem	fnmpo 6093*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> F Fn ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	mpofvex 6094*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x A. y C e. V /\ R e. W /\ S e. X ) -> ( R F S ) e. _V )
Theorem	fnmpoi 6095*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- F Fn ( A X. B )
Theorem	dmmpo 6096*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- dom F = ( A X. B )
Theorem	mpofvexi 6097*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- R e. _V   &    |- S e. _V   =>    |- ( R F S ) e. _V
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 6098*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
|- O = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. M /\ X e. A /\ Y e. B ) -> ( X O Y ) e. M )
Theorem	dmmpoga 6099*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6096. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )
Theorem	dmmpog 6100*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6096. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
|- F = ( x e. A , y e. B |-> C )   =>    |- ( C e. V -> dom F = ( A X. B ) )