ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  opabid Unicode version

Theorem opabid 4022
Description: The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
opabid  |-  ( <.
x ,  y >.  e.  { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ph }  <->  ph )

Proof of Theorem opabid
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 vex 2577 . . 3  |-  x  e. 
_V
2 vex 2577 . . 3  |-  y  e. 
_V
31, 2opex 3994 . 2  |-  <. x ,  y >.  e.  _V
4 copsexg 4009 . . 3  |-  ( z  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( ph  <->  E. x E. y ( z  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) ) )
54bicomd 133 . 2  |-  ( z  =  <. x ,  y
>.  ->  ( E. x E. y ( z  = 
<. x ,  y >.  /\  ph )  <->  ph ) )
6 df-opab 3847 . 2  |-  { <. x ,  y >.  |  ph }  =  { z  |  E. x E. y
( z  =  <. x ,  y >.  /\  ph ) }
73, 5, 6elab2 2713 1  |-  ( <.
x ,  y >.  e.  { <. x ,  y
>.  |  ph }  <->  ph )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:    /\ wa 101    <-> wb 102    = wceq 1259   E.wex 1397    e. wcel 1409   <.cop 3406   {copab 3845
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-14 1421  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038  ax-sep 3903  ax-pow 3955  ax-pr 3972
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-3an 898  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-eu 1919  df-mo 1920  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-v 2576  df-un 2950  df-in 2952  df-ss 2959  df-pw 3389  df-sn 3409  df-pr 3410  df-op 3412  df-opab 3847
This theorem is referenced by:  opelopabsb  4025  ssopab2b  4041  dmopab  4574  rnopab  4609  funopab  4963  funco  4968  fvmptss2  5275  f1ompt  5348  ovid  5645  enssdom  6273
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator