Theorem oprabbidv 5590

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal operation class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
oprabbidv.1	|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabbidv	|- ( ph -> { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ch } )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z, ph   y, z, ph

Allowed substitution hints:   ps( x, y, z)   ch( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem oprabbidv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1462	. 2 |- F/ x ph
2		nfv 1462	. 2 |- F/ y ph
3		nfv 1462	. 2 |- F/ z ph
4		oprabbidv.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
5	1, 2, 3, 4	oprabbid 5589	1 |- ( ph -> { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ps } = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ch } )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   = wceq 1285   {coprab 5544

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-11 1438  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-oprab 5547

This theorem is referenced by:  oprabbii  5591  mpt2eq123dva  5597  mpt2eq3dva  5600  resoprab2  5629  erovlem  6264