Theorem rmob 2996

Description: Consequence of "at most one", using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rmoi.b	|- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
rmoi.c	|- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> ch ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rmob	|- ( ( E* x e. A ph /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   x, C   ps, x   ch, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem rmob

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rmo 2422	. 2 |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
2		simprl 520	. . . 4 |- ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> B e. A )
3		eleq1 2200	. . . 4 |- ( B = C -> ( B e. A <-> C e. A ) )
4	2, 3	syl5ibcom 154	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( B = C -> C e. A ) )
5		simpl 108	. . . 4 |- ( ( C e. A /\ ch ) -> C e. A )
6	5	a1i 9	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( ( C e. A /\ ch ) -> C e. A ) )
7		simplrl 524	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) /\ C e. A ) -> B e. A )
8		simpr 109	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) /\ C e. A ) -> C e. A )
9		simpll 518	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) /\ C e. A ) -> E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
10		simplrr 525	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) /\ C e. A ) -> ps )
11		eleq1 2200	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = B -> ( x e. A <-> B e. A ) )
12		rmoi.b	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
13	11, 12	anbi12d 464	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = B -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) )
14		eleq1 2200	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = C -> ( x e. A <-> C e. A ) )
15		rmoi.c	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
16	14, 15	anbi12d 464	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = C -> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )
17	13, 16	mob 2861	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) /\ E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )
18	7, 8, 9, 7, 10, 17	syl212anc 1226	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) /\ C e. A ) -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )
19	18	ex 114	. . 3 |- ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( C e. A -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) ) )
20	4, 6, 19	pm5.21ndd 694	. 2 |- ( ( E* x ( x e. A /\ ph ) /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )
21	1, 20	sylanb 282	1 |- ( ( E* x e. A ph /\ ( B e. A /\ ps ) ) -> ( B = C <-> ( C e. A /\ ch ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   E*wmo 1998   E*wrmo 2417

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-rmo 2422  df-v 2683

This theorem is referenced by:  rmoi  2997