Theorem sb7af 1911

Description: An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1687. Similar to dfsb7a 1912 but does not require that ph and z be distinct. Similar to sb7f 1910 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7af.1	|- F/ z ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7af	|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem sb7af

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb6 1808	. . 3 |- ( [ z / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) )
2	1	sbbii 1689	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / z ] A. x ( x = z -> ph ) )
3		sb7af.1	. . 3 |- F/ z ph
4	3	sbco2 1881	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
5		sb6 1808	. 2 |- ( [ y / z ] A. x ( x = z -> ph ) <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 208	1 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 103   A.wal 1283   F/wnf 1390   [wsb 1686

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687

This theorem is referenced by:  dfsb7a  1912