Theorem sb8iota 5090

Description: Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2010. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb8iota.1	|- F/ y ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb8iota	|- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y [ y / x ] ph )

Proof of Theorem sb8iota

Dummy variables z w are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1508	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w ( ph <-> x = z )
2	1	sb8 1828	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> A. w [ w / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) )
3		sbbi 1930	. . . . . . 7 |- ( [ w / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> ( [ w / x ] ph <-> [ w / x ] x = z ) )
4		sb8iota.1	. . . . . . . . 9 |- F/ y ph
5	4	nfsb 1917	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [ w / x ] ph
6		equsb3 1922	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( [ w / x ] x = z <-> w = z )
7		nfv 1508	. . . . . . . . 9 |- F/ y w = z
8	6, 7	nfxfr 1450	. . . . . . . 8 |- F/ y [ w / x ] x = z
9	5, 8	nfbi 1568	. . . . . . 7 |- F/ y ( [ w / x ] ph <-> [ w / x ] x = z )
10	3, 9	nfxfr 1450	. . . . . 6 |- F/ y [ w / x ] ( ph <-> x = z )
11		nfv 1508	. . . . . 6 |- F/ w [ y / x ] ( ph <-> x = z )
12		sbequ 1812	. . . . . 6 |- ( w = y -> ( [ w / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> [ y / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) ) )
13	10, 11, 12	cbval 1727	. . . . 5 |- ( A. w [ w / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> A. y [ y / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) )
14		equsb3 1922	. . . . . . 7 |- ( [ y / x ] x = z <-> y = z )
15	14	sblbis 1931	. . . . . 6 |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) )
16	15	albii 1446	. . . . 5 |- ( A. y [ y / x ] ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> A. y ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) )
17	2, 13, 16	3bitri 205	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) <-> A. y ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) )
18	17	abbii 2253	. . 3 |- { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } = { z | A. y ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) }
19	18	unieqi 3741	. 2 |- U. { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) } = U. { z | A. y ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) }
20		dfiota2 5084	. 2 |- ( iota x ph ) = U. { z | A. x ( ph <-> x = z ) }
21		dfiota2 5084	. 2 |- ( iota y [ y / x ] ph ) = U. { z | A. y ( [ y / x ] ph <-> y = z ) }
22	19, 20, 21	3eqtr4i 2168	1 |- ( iota x ph ) = ( iota y [ y / x ] ph )

Syntax hints:   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1329   = wceq 1331   F/wnf 1436   [wsb 1735   {cab 2123   U.cuni 3731   iotacio 5081

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-rex 2420  df-sn 3528  df-uni 3732  df-iota 5083

This theorem is referenced by: (None)