Theorem suppssof1 5780

Description: Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssof1.s	|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssof1.o	|- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
suppssof1.a	|- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
suppssof1.b	|- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
suppssof1.d	|- ( ph -> D e. W )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssof1	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, v   v, B   v, O   v, R   v, Y   v, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( v)   D( v)   L( v)   V( v)   W( v)

Proof of Theorem suppssof1

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppssof1.a	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
2		ffn 5097	. . . . . 6 |- ( A : D --> V -> A Fn D )
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A Fn D )
4		suppssof1.b	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
5		ffn 5097	. . . . . 6 |- ( B : D --> R -> B Fn D )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B Fn D )
7		suppssof1.d	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> D e. W )
8		inidm 3191	. . . . 5 |- ( D i^i D ) = D
9		eqidd 2084	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) = ( A ` x ) )
10		eqidd 2084	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) = ( B ` x ) )
11	3, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10	offval 5771	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A oF O B ) = ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
12	11	cnveqd 4559	. . 3 |- ( ph -> `' ( A oF O B ) = `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
13	12	imaeq1d 4717	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) )
14	1	feqmptd 5279	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A = ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
15	14	cnveqd 4559	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> `' A = `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
16	15	imaeq1d 4717	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17		suppssof1.s	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
18	16, 17	eqsstr3d 3043	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
19		suppssof1.o	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
20		funfvex 5244	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun A /\ x e. dom A ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
21	20	funfni 5050	. . . 4 |- ( ( A Fn D /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
22	3, 21	sylan 277	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
23	4	ffvelrnda 5355	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) e. R )
24	18, 19, 22, 23	suppssov1 5761	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
25	13, 24	eqsstrd 3042	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 102   = wceq 1285   e. wcel 1434   _Vcvv 2610   \ cdif 2979   C_ wss 2982   {csn 3416   |-> cmpt 3859   `'ccnv 4390   "cima 4394   Fn wfn 4947   -->wf 4948   ` cfv 4952  (class class class)co 5564   oFcof 5762

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-coll 3913  ax-sep 3916  ax-pow 3968  ax-pr 3992  ax-setind 4308

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-fal 1291  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-eu 1946  df-mo 1947  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ne 2250  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-reu 2360  df-rab 2362  df-v 2612  df-sbc 2825  df-csb 2918  df-dif 2984  df-un 2986  df-in 2988  df-ss 2995  df-pw 3402  df-sn 3422  df-pr 3423  df-op 3425  df-uni 3622  df-iun 3700  df-br 3806  df-opab 3860  df-mpt 3861  df-id 4076  df-xp 4397  df-rel 4398  df-cnv 4399  df-co 4400  df-dm 4401  df-rn 4402  df-res 4403  df-ima 4404  df-iota 4917  df-fun 4954  df-fn 4955  df-f 4956  df-f1 4957  df-fo 4958  df-f1o 4959  df-fv 4960  df-ov 5567  df-oprab 5568  df-mpt2 5569  df-of 5764

This theorem is referenced by: (None)