Theorem ax11a2 1744

Description: Derive ax-11o 1746 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-11 1438. The hypothesis is even weaker than ax-11 1438, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax11o 1745. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax11a2.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11a2	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ax11a2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-17 1460	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
2		ax11a2.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
3	1, 2	syl5 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
4	3	ax11v2 1743	1 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1283

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11o  1745