Theorem ax11o 1794

Description: Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1795 from the shorter ax-11 1484 that has replaced it.

An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1786 or ax-17 1506.

Normally, ax11o 1794 should be used rather than ax-11o 1795, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11o	⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Proof of Theorem ax11o

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-11 1484	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑)))
2	1	ax11a2 1793	1 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1329

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11b  1798  equs5  1801