Theorem axext4 2121

Description: A bidirectional version of Extensionality. Although this theorem "looks" like it is just a definition of equality, it requires the Axiom of Extensionality for its proof under our axiomatization. See the comments for ax-ext 2119. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2008.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axext4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem axext4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elequ2 1691	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
2	1	alrimiv 1846	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
3		axext3 2120	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	2, 3	impbii 125	1 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437

This theorem is referenced by: (None)