Theorem bdceq 13029

Description: Equality property for the predicate BOUNDED. (Contributed by BJ, 3-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdceq.1	⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdceq	⊢ (BOUNDED 𝐴 ↔ BOUNDED 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem bdceq

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdceq.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
2	1	eleq2i 2204	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
3	2	bdeq 13010	. . 3 ⊢ (BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	albii 1446	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
5		df-bdc 13028	. 2 ⊢ (BOUNDED 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
6		df-bdc 13028	. 2 ⊢ (BOUNDED 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥BOUNDED 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
7	4, 5, 6	3bitr4i 211	1 ⊢ (BOUNDED 𝐴 ↔ BOUNDED 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  BOUNDED wbd 12999  BOUNDED wbdc 13027

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-ial 1514  ax-ext 2119  ax-bd0 13000

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-bdc 13028

This theorem is referenced by:  bdceqi  13030