Theorem bdreu 13042

Description: Boundedness of existential uniqueness.

Remark regarding restricted quantifiers: the formula ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 need not be bounded even if 𝐴 and 𝜑 are. Indeed, V is bounded by bdcvv 13044, and ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥𝜑) (in minimal propositional calculus), so by bd0 13011, if ∀𝑥 ∈ V𝜑 were bounded when 𝜑 is bounded, then ∀𝑥𝜑 would be bounded as well when 𝜑 is bounded, which is not the case. The same remark holds with ∃, ∃!, ∃*. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Oct-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdreu.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdreu	⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bdreu

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdreu.1	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	ax-bdex 13006	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑
3		ax-bdeq 13007	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 = 𝑧
4	1, 3	ax-bdim 13001	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
5	4	ax-bdal 13005	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
6	5	ax-bdex 13006	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
7	2, 6	ax-bdan 13002	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
8		reu3 2869	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)))
9	7, 8	bd0r 13012	1 ⊢ BOUNDED ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103  ∀wral 2414  ∃wrex 2415  ∃!wreu 2416  BOUNDED wbd 12999

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-bd0 13000  ax-bdim 13001  ax-bdan 13002  ax-bdal 13005  ax-bdex 13006  ax-bdeq 13007

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-reu 2421  df-rmo 2422

This theorem is referenced by:  bdrmo  13043