Theorem bdsepnf 13086

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 13082 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a non-freeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 13087. Use bdsep1 13083 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
bdsepnf.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑎,𝑏)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdsepnft 13085	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑏𝜑 → ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑏𝜑
4	2, 3	mpg 1427	1 ⊢ ∃𝑏∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329  Ⅎwnf 1436  ∃wex 1468  BOUNDED wbd 13010

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-bdsep 13082

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135

This theorem is referenced by: (None)