Theorem bdzfauscl 13088

Description: Closed form of the version of zfauscl 4048 for bounded formulas using bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdzfauscl.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdzfauscl	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bdzfauscl

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2203	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	anbi1d 460	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1796	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1797	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		bdzfauscl.bd	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
7	6	bdsep1 13083	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	vtoclg 2746	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468   ∈ wcel 1480  BOUNDED wbd 13010

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-bdsep 13082

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-v 2688

This theorem is referenced by:  bdinex1  13097