Theorem bj-bdfindis 11009

Description: Bounded induction (principle of induction for bounded formulas), using implicit substitutions (the biconditional versions of the hypotheses are implicit substitutions, and we have weakened them to implications). Constructive proof (from CZF). See finds 4369 for a proof of full induction in IZF. From this version, it is easy to prove bounded versions of finds 4369, finds2 4370, finds1 4371. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bj-bdfindis.nf0	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
bj-bdfindis.nf1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜃
bj-bdfindis.0	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
bj-bdfindis.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
bj-bdfindis.suc	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-bdfindis	⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-bdfindis

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-bdfindis.nf0	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
2		0ex 3925	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3		bj-bdfindis.0	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
4	1, 2, 3	elabf2 10852	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 → ∅ ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
5		bj-bdfindis.nf1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
6		bj-bdfindis.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))
7	5, 6	elabf1 10851	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒)
8		bj-bdfindis.nfsuc	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜃
9		vex 2613	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
10	9	bj-sucex 10981	. . . . . 6 ⊢ suc 𝑦 ∈ V
11		bj-bdfindis.suc	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
12	8, 10, 11	elabf2 10852	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜃 → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
13	7, 12	imim12i 58	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜃) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
14	13	ralimi 2431	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃) → ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
15		bj-bdfindis.bd	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
16	15	bdcab 10907	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
17	16	bdpeano5 11005	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
18	4, 14, 17	syl2an 283	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
19		ssabral 3074	. 2 ⊢ (ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)
20	18, 19	sylib 120	1 ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1285  Ⅎwnf 1390   ∈ wcel 1434  {cab 2069  ∀wral 2353   ⊆ wss 2982  ∅c0 3267  suc csuc 4148  ωcom 4359  BOUNDED wbd 10870

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-13 1445  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-nul 3924  ax-pr 3992  ax-un 4216  ax-bd0 10871  ax-bdor 10874  ax-bdex 10877  ax-bdeq 10878  ax-bdel 10879  ax-bdsb 10880  ax-bdsep 10942  ax-infvn 11003

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-rab 2362  df-v 2612  df-dif 2984  df-un 2986  df-in 2988  df-ss 2995  df-nul 3268  df-sn 3422  df-pr 3423  df-uni 3622  df-int 3657  df-suc 4154  df-iom 4360  df-bdc 10899  df-bj-ind 10989

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-bdfindisg  11010  bj-bdfindes  11011  bj-nn0suc0  11012