Theorem bj-omtrans 11036

Description: The set ω is transitive. A natural number is included in ω. Constructive proof of elnn 4374.

The idea is to use bounded induction with the formula 𝑥 ⊆ ω. This formula, in a logic with terms, is bounded. So in our logic without terms, we need to temporarily replace it with 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 and then deduce the original claim. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omtrans	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)

Proof of Theorem bj-omtrans

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-omex 11022	. . 3 ⊢ ω ∈ V
2		sseq2 3030	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
3		sseq2 3030	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
4	2, 3	imbi12d 232	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)))
5	4	ralbidv 2373	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)))
6		sseq2 3030	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ω))
7	6	imbi2d 228	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)))
8	5, 7	imbi12d 232	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = ω → ((∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω))))
9		0ss 3298	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ⊆ 𝑎
10		bdcv 10924	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
11	10	bdss 10940	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎
12		nfv 1462	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∅ ⊆ 𝑎
13		nfv 1462	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎
14		nfv 1462	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎
15		sseq1 3029	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ ∅ ⊆ 𝑎))
16	15	biimprd 156	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∅ ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎))
17		sseq1 3029	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
18	17	biimpd 142	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
19		sseq1 3029	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎))
20	19	biimprd 156	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎))
21		nfcv 2223	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
22		nfv 1462	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎
23		sseq1 3029	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
24	23	biimpd 142	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
25	11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24	bj-bdfindisg 11028	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ⊆ 𝑎 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎)) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
26	9, 25	mpan 415	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎 → suc 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑎) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑎))
27	1, 8, 26	vtocl 2662	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ ω (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω))
28		df-suc 4154	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝑦 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑦})
29		simpr 108	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → 𝑦 ⊆ ω)
30		simpl 107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ ω)
31	30	snssd 3550	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → {𝑦} ⊆ ω)
32	29, 31	unssd 3158	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → (𝑦 ∪ {𝑦}) ⊆ ω)
33	28, 32	syl5eqss 3052	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ ω) → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω)
34	33	ex 113	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑦 ⊆ ω → suc 𝑦 ⊆ ω))
35	27, 34	mprg 2425	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1285   ∈ wcel 1434  ∀wral 2353   ∪ cun 2980   ⊆ wss 2982  ∅c0 3267  {csn 3416  suc csuc 4148  ωcom 4359

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-13 1445  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065  ax-nul 3924  ax-pr 3992  ax-un 4216  ax-bd0 10889  ax-bdor 10892  ax-bdal 10894  ax-bdex 10895  ax-bdeq 10896  ax-bdel 10897  ax-bdsb 10898  ax-bdsep 10960  ax-infvn 11021

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-rab 2362  df-v 2612  df-dif 2984  df-un 2986  df-in 2988  df-ss 2995  df-nul 3268  df-sn 3422  df-pr 3423  df-uni 3622  df-int 3657  df-suc 4154  df-iom 4360  df-bdc 10917  df-bj-ind 11007

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omtrans2  11037  bj-nnord  11038  bj-nn0suc  11044