Theorem cbvopab2v 4000

Description: Rule used to change the second bound variable in an ordered pair abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1999.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v.1	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvopab2v	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑧   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab2v

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opeq2 3701	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩)
2	1	eqeq2d 2149	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩))
3		cbvopab2v.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	2, 3	anbi12d 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	4	cbvexv 1890	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
6	5	exbii 1584	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
7	6	abbii 2253	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
8		df-opab 3985	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
9		df-opab 3985	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4i 2168	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331  ∃wex 1468  {cab 2123  ⟨cop 3525  {copab 3983

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-v 2683  df-un 3070  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-opab 3985

This theorem is referenced by: (None)