Theorem cbvrexdva2 2553

Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvraldva2.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
cbvraldva2.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexdva2	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐴   𝜓,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵   𝜒,𝑥   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexdva2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 107	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
2		cbvraldva2.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
3	1, 2	eleq12d 2122	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
4		cbvraldva2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
5	3, 4	anbi12d 450	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
6	5	cbvexdva 1818	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-rex 2327	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
8		df-rex 2327	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒))
9	6, 7, 8	3bitr4g 216	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 101   ↔ wb 102   = wceq 1257  ∃wex 1395   ∈ wcel 1407  ∃wrex 2322

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-5 1350  ax-7 1351  ax-gen 1352  ax-ie1 1396  ax-ie2 1397  ax-8 1409  ax-4 1414  ax-17 1433  ax-i9 1437  ax-ial 1441  ax-ext 2036

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-nf 1364  df-cleq 2047  df-clel 2050  df-rex 2327

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrexdva  2555  acexmid  5536