Theorem csbiebg 3037

Description: Bidirectional conversion between an implicit class substitution hypothesis 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶 and its explicit substitution equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
csbiebg.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
csbiebg	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem csbiebg

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq2 2147	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝑎 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
2	1	imbi1d 230	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
3	2	albidv 1796	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)))
4		csbeq1 3001	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
5	4	eqeq1d 2146	. 2 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))
6		vex 2684	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
7		csbiebg.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶
8	6, 7	csbieb 3036	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑎 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝑎 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶)
9	3, 5, 8	vtoclbg 2742	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  Ⅎwnfc 2266  ⦋csb 2998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-csb 2999

This theorem is referenced by: (None)