Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > df-en | GIF version |
Description: Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ≈ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6609. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
df-en | ⊢ ≈ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | cen 6600 | . 2 class ≈ | |
2 | vx | . . . . . 6 setvar 𝑥 | |
3 | 2 | cv 1315 | . . . . 5 class 𝑥 |
4 | vy | . . . . . 6 setvar 𝑦 | |
5 | 4 | cv 1315 | . . . . 5 class 𝑦 |
6 | vf | . . . . . 6 setvar 𝑓 | |
7 | 6 | cv 1315 | . . . . 5 class 𝑓 |
8 | 3, 5, 7 | wf1o 5092 | . . . 4 wff 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦 |
9 | 8, 6 | wex 1453 | . . 3 wff ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦 |
10 | 9, 2, 4 | copab 3958 | . 2 class {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦} |
11 | 1, 10 | wceq 1316 | 1 wff ≈ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1-onto→𝑦} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
This definition is referenced by: relen 6606 bren 6609 enssdom 6624 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |