ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  dfoprab3s GIF version

Theorem dfoprab3s 5841
Description: A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
dfoprab3s {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3s
StepHypRef Expression
1 dfoprab2 5577 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2 nfsbc1v 2834 . . . . 5 𝑥[(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
3219.41 1617 . . . 4 (∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
4 sbcopeq1a 5838 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑𝜑))
54pm5.32i 442 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
65exbii 1537 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7 nfcv 2220 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦(1st𝑤)
8 nfsbc1v 2834 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦[(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
97, 8nfsbc 2836 . . . . . . 7 𝑦[(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑
10919.41 1617 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
116, 10bitr3i 184 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
1211exbii 1537 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
13 elvv 4422 . . . . 5 (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
1413anbi1i 446 . . . 4 ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑦 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
153, 12, 143bitr4i 210 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑))
1615opabbii 3847 . 2 {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
171, 16eqtri 2102 1 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 102   = wceq 1285  wex 1422  wcel 1434  Vcvv 2602  [wsbc 2816  cop 3403  {copab 3840   × cxp 4363  cfv 4926  {coprab 5538  1st c1st 5790  2nd c2nd 5791
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-13 1445  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-sep 3898  ax-pow 3950  ax-pr 3966  ax-un 4190
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-eu 1945  df-mo 1946  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-ral 2354  df-rex 2355  df-v 2604  df-sbc 2817  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-pw 3386  df-sn 3406  df-pr 3407  df-op 3409  df-uni 3604  df-br 3788  df-opab 3842  df-mpt 3843  df-id 4050  df-xp 4371  df-rel 4372  df-cnv 4373  df-co 4374  df-dm 4375  df-rn 4376  df-iota 4891  df-fun 4928  df-fv 4934  df-oprab 5541  df-1st 5792  df-2nd 5793
This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab3  5842
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator