Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > dfrab2 | GIF version |
Description: Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
dfrab2 | ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2423 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | inab 3339 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
3 | abid2 2258 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
4 | 3 | ineq1i 3268 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
5 | 2, 4 | eqtr3i 2160 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
6 | incom 3263 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) | |
7 | 1, 5, 6 | 3eqtri 2162 | 1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1331 ∈ wcel 1480 {cab 2123 {crab 2418 ∩ cin 3065 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2124 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-nfc 2268 df-rab 2423 df-v 2683 df-in 3072 |
This theorem is referenced by: minmax 10994 xrminmax 11027 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |