Theorem dfrab3ss 3349

Description: Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrab3ss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfrab3ss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3079	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2		ineq1 3265	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
3	2	eqcomd 2143	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
4	1, 3	sylbi 120	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
5		dfrab3 3347	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
6		dfrab3 3347	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
7	6	ineq2i 3269	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
8		inass 3281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
9	7, 8	eqtr4i 2161	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
10	4, 5, 9	3eqtr4g 2195	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1331  {cab 2123  {crab 2418   ∩ cin 3065   ⊆ wss 3066

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079

This theorem is referenced by: (None)