ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difab GIF version

Theorem difab 3233
Description: Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difab ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem difab
Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-clab 2043 . . 3 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
2 sban 1845 . . 3 ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓))
3 df-clab 2043 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
43bicomi 127 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑})
5 sbn 1842 . . . . 5 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
6 df-clab 2043 . . . . 5 (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
75, 6xchbinxr 618 . . . 4 ([𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓})
84, 7anbi12i 441 . . 3 (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}))
91, 2, 83bitrri 200 . 2 ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥𝜓}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
109difeqri 3091 1 ({𝑥𝜑} ∖ {𝑥𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wa 101   = wceq 1259  wcel 1409  [wsb 1661  {cab 2042  cdif 2941
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-in1 554  ax-in2 555  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-tru 1262  df-fal 1265  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-v 2576  df-dif 2947
This theorem is referenced by:  notab  3234  difrab  3238  notrab  3241  imadiflem  5005  imadif  5006
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator