ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  difin2 GIF version

Theorem difin2 3226
Description: Represent a set difference as an intersection with a larger difference. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
difin2 (𝐴𝐶 → (𝐴𝐵) = ((𝐶𝐵) ∩ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem difin2
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssel 2966 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐶 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶))
21pm4.71d 379 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐶 → (𝑥𝐴 ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶)))
32anbi1d 446 . . 3 (𝐴𝐶 → ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)))
4 eldif 2954 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
5 elin 3153 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐴))
6 eldif 2954 . . . . 5 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
76anbi1i 439 . . . 4 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐴))
8 ancom 257 . . . . 5 (((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)))
9 anass 387 . . . . 5 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵)))
108, 9bitr4i 180 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
115, 7, 103bitri 199 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐶) ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
123, 4, 113bitr4g 216 . 2 (𝐴𝐶 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐶𝐵) ∩ 𝐴)))
1312eqrdv 2054 1 (𝐴𝐶 → (𝐴𝐵) = ((𝐶𝐵) ∩ 𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 101   = wceq 1259  wcel 1409  cdif 2941  cin 2943  wss 2944
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-in1 554  ax-in2 555  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-v 2576  df-dif 2947  df-in 2951  df-ss 2958
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator