ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elintrab GIF version

Theorem elintrab 3778
Description: Membership in the intersection of a class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
inteqab.1 𝐴 ∈ V
Assertion
Ref Expression
elintrab (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐵(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elintrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 inteqab.1 . . . 4 𝐴 ∈ V
21elintab 3777 . . 3 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥))
3 impexp 261 . . . 4 (((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
43albii 1446 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝜑) → 𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
52, 4bitri 183 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
6 df-rab 2423 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
76inteqi 3770 . . 3 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
87eleq2i 2204 . 2 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
9 df-ral 2419 . 2 (∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥𝐵 → (𝜑𝐴𝑥)))
105, 8, 93bitr4i 211 1 (𝐴 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝐵 (𝜑𝐴𝑥))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 103  wb 104  wal 1329  wcel 1480  {cab 2123  wral 2414  {crab 2418  Vcvv 2681   cint 3766
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683  df-int 3767
This theorem is referenced by:  elintrabg  3779  intmin  3786  bj-indint  13118
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator