Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  elxpi GIF version

Theorem elxpi 4388
 Description: Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4389. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elxpi (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦

Proof of Theorem elxpi
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqeq1 2062 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
21anbi1d 446 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
322exbidv 1764 . . . 4 (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
43elabg 2710 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))))
54ibi 169 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))} → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
6 df-xp 4378 . . 3 (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)}
7 df-opab 3846 . . 3 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))}
86, 7eqtri 2076 . 2 (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶))}
95, 8eleq2s 2148 1 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∃𝑥𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶)))
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 101   = wceq 1259  ∃wex 1397   ∈ wcel 1409  {cab 2042  ⟨cop 3405  {copab 3844   × cxp 4370 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-v 2576  df-opab 3846  df-xp 4378 This theorem is referenced by:  xpsspw  4477  dmaddpqlem  6532  nqpi  6533  enq0ref  6588  nqnq0  6596  nq0nn  6597  axaddcl  6997  axmulcl  6999
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator