Theorem frforeq3 4264

Description: Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frforeq3	⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇))

Proof of Theorem frforeq3

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2201	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
2	1	imbi2d 229	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
3	2	ralbidv 2435	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
4		eleq2 2201	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇))
5	3, 4	imbi12d 233	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
6	5	ralbidv 2435	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇)))
7		sseq2 3116	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
8	6, 7	imbi12d 233	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇)))
9		df-frfor 4248	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆))
10		df-frfor 4248	. 2 ⊢ ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇))
11	8, 9, 10	3bitr4g 222	1 ⊢ (𝑆 = 𝑇 → ( FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑆 ↔ FrFor 𝑅𝐴𝑇))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  ∀wral 2414   ⊆ wss 3066   class class class wbr 3924   FrFor wfrfor 4244

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-11 1484  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-ral 2419  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-frfor 4248

This theorem is referenced by:  frind  4269