Theorem funfvdm2f 5479

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfvdm2 5478 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfvdm2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfvdm2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvdm2 5478	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfvdm2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfvdm2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2279	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 3969	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1508	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 3928	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvab 2261	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 3741	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	syl6eq 2186	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  {cab 2123  Ⅎwnfc 2266  ∪ cuni 3731   class class class wbr 3924  dom cdm 4534  Fun wfun 5112  ‘cfv 5118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119  ax-sep 4041  ax-pow 4093  ax-pr 4126

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-mo 2001  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-ral 2419  df-rex 2420  df-v 2683  df-sbc 2905  df-un 3070  df-in 3072  df-ss 3079  df-pw 3507  df-sn 3528  df-pr 3529  df-op 3531  df-uni 3732  df-br 3925  df-opab 3985  df-id 4210  df-xp 4540  df-rel 4541  df-cnv 4542  df-co 4543  df-dm 4544  df-rn 4545  df-res 4546  df-ima 4547  df-iota 5083  df-fun 5120  df-fn 5121  df-fv 5126

This theorem is referenced by: (None)