Theorem inex1 3916

Description: Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using class notation. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
inex1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex1	⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V

Proof of Theorem inex1

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	zfauscl 3902	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
3		dfcleq 2048	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
4		elin 3151	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	bibi2i 220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
6	5	albii 1373	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	3, 6	bitri 177	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	exbii 1510	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
9	2, 8	mpbir 138	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
10	9	issetri 2579	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 101   ↔ wb 102  ∀wal 1255   = wceq 1257  ∃wex 1395   ∈ wcel 1407  Vcvv 2572   ∩ cin 2941

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 638  ax-5 1350  ax-7 1351  ax-gen 1352  ax-ie1 1396  ax-ie2 1397  ax-8 1409  ax-10 1410  ax-11 1411  ax-i12 1412  ax-bndl 1413  ax-4 1414  ax-17 1433  ax-i9 1437  ax-ial 1441  ax-i5r 1442  ax-ext 2036  ax-sep 3900

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-tru 1260  df-nf 1364  df-sb 1660  df-clab 2041  df-cleq 2047  df-clel 2050  df-nfc 2181  df-v 2574  df-in 2949

This theorem is referenced by:  inex2  3917  inex1g  3918  inuni  3934  bnd2  3951  peano5  4346  ssimaex  5259  ofmres  5788  tfrexlem  5976