Theorem inex1 3914

Description: Separation Scheme (Aussonderung) using class notation. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
inex1.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inex1	⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V

Proof of Theorem inex1

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inex1.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	zfauscl 3900	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
3		dfcleq 2076	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
4		elin 3156	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	bibi2i 225	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
6	5	albii 1400	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
7	3, 6	bitri 182	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
8	7	exbii 1537	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
9	2, 8	mpbir 144	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
10	9	issetri 2609	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103  ∀wal 1283   = wceq 1285  ∃wex 1422   ∈ wcel 1434  Vcvv 2602   ∩ cin 2973

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-sep 3898

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-v 2604  df-in 2980

This theorem is referenced by:  inex2  3915  inex1g  3916  inuni  3932  bnd2  3949  peano5  4341  ssimaex  5260  ofmres  5788  tfrexlem  5977