ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  inrab2 GIF version

Theorem inrab2 3238
Description: Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
inrab2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐵
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem inrab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2332 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 abid2 2174 . . . 4 {𝑥𝑥𝐵} = 𝐵
32eqcomi 2060 . . 3 𝐵 = {𝑥𝑥𝐵}
41, 3ineq12i 3164 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
5 df-rab 2332 . . 3 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
6 inab 3233 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
7 elin 3154 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
87anbi1i 439 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
9 an32 504 . . . . . 6 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
108, 9bitri 177 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵))
1110abbii 2169 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∧ 𝑥𝐵)}
126, 11eqtr4i 2079 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
135, 12eqtr4i 2079 . 2 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∩ {𝑥𝑥𝐵})
144, 13eqtr4i 2079 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 101   = wceq 1259  wcel 1409  {cab 2042  {crab 2327  cin 2944
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 103  ax-ia2 104  ax-ia3 105  ax-io 640  ax-5 1352  ax-7 1353  ax-gen 1354  ax-ie1 1398  ax-ie2 1399  ax-8 1411  ax-10 1412  ax-11 1413  ax-i12 1414  ax-bndl 1415  ax-4 1416  ax-17 1435  ax-i9 1439  ax-ial 1443  ax-i5r 1444  ax-ext 2038
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 114  df-tru 1262  df-nf 1366  df-sb 1662  df-clab 2043  df-cleq 2049  df-clel 2052  df-nfc 2183  df-rab 2332  df-v 2576  df-in 2952
This theorem is referenced by:  iooval2  8885  fzval2  8979
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator