Theorem inteq 3660

Description: Equality law for intersection. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1999.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inteq	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem inteq

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		raleq 2555	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
2	1	abbidv 2200	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦} = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦})
3		dfint2 3659	. 2 ⊢ ∩ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
4		dfint2 3659	. 2 ⊢ ∩ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
5	2, 3, 4	3eqtr4g 2140	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩ 𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1285  {cab 2069  ∀wral 2353  ∩ cint 3657

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ral 2358  df-int 3658

This theorem is referenced by:  inteqi  3661  inteqd  3662  uniintsnr  3693  rint0  3696  intexr  3946  onintexmid  4344  elreldm  4609  elxp5  4860  1stval2  5835  fundmen  6376  xpsnen  6388  bj-intexr  10991