ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  isarep2 GIF version

Theorem isarep2 5011
Description: Part of a study of the Axiom of Replacement used by the Isabelle prover. In Isabelle, the sethood of PrimReplace is apparently postulated implicitly by its type signature "[ i, [ i, i ] => o ] => i", which automatically asserts that it is a set without using any axioms. To prove that it is a set in Metamath, we need the hypotheses of Isabelle's "Axiom of Replacement" as well as the Axiom of Replacement in the form funimaex 5009. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2006.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
isarep2.1 𝐴 ∈ V
isarep2.2 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Assertion
Ref Expression
isarep2 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑤   𝜑,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑧)

Proof of Theorem isarep2
StepHypRef Expression
1 resima 4665 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
2 resopab 4676 . . . . 5 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
32imaeq1i 4689 . . . 4 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
41, 3eqtr3i 2104 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴)
5 funopab 4959 . . . . 5 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑))
6 isarep2.2 . . . . . . . 8 𝑥𝐴𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)
76rspec 2416 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥𝐴 → ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8 nfv 1462 . . . . . . . 8 𝑧𝜑
98mo3 1996 . . . . . . 7 (∃*𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑧((𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜑) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))
107, 9sylibr 132 . . . . . 6 (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑)
11 moanimv 2017 . . . . . 6 (∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑) ↔ (𝑥𝐴 → ∃*𝑦𝜑))
1210, 11mpbir 144 . . . . 5 ∃*𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝜑)
135, 12mpgbir 1383 . . . 4 Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
14 isarep2.1 . . . . 5 𝐴 ∈ V
1514funimaex 5009 . . . 4 (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V)
1613, 15ax-mp 7 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
174, 16eqeltri 2152 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴) ∈ V
1817isseti 2608 1 𝑤 𝑤 = ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} “ 𝐴)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102  wal 1283   = wceq 1285  wex 1422  wcel 1434  [wsb 1686  ∃*wmo 1943  wral 2349  Vcvv 2602  {copab 3840  cres 4367  cima 4368  Fun wfun 4920
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-14 1446  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064  ax-coll 3895  ax-sep 3898  ax-pow 3950  ax-pr 3966
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-eu 1945  df-mo 1946  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-ral 2354  df-rex 2355  df-v 2604  df-un 2978  df-in 2980  df-ss 2987  df-pw 3386  df-sn 3406  df-pr 3407  df-op 3409  df-br 3788  df-opab 3842  df-id 4050  df-xp 4371  df-rel 4372  df-cnv 4373  df-co 4374  df-dm 4375  df-rn 4376  df-res 4377  df-ima 4378  df-fun 4928
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator