P. 35 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pwss 3401*	Subclass relationship for power class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
2.1.17  Unordered and ordered pairs
Syntax	csn 3402	Extend class notation to include singleton.
class {𝐴}
Syntax	cpr 3403	Extend class notation to include unordered pair.
class {𝐴, 𝐵}
Syntax	ctp 3404	Extend class notation to include unordered triplet.
class {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}
Syntax	cop 3405	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Syntax	cotp 3406	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	snjust 3407*	Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3408. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴}
Definition	df-sn 3408*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3416. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐴}
Definition	df-pr 3409	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴} as proven by prcom 3473. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3421. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵})
Definition	df-tp 3410	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶})
Definition	df-op 3411*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}} when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3598 and opprc2 3599). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3575. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, which has different behavior from our df-op 3411 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3411 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩_2 = {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}}. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩_3 = {𝐴, {𝐴, 𝐵}}, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {{𝐴}, {𝐴, 𝐵}})}
Definition	df-ot 3412	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩
Theorem	sneq 3413	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	sneqi 3414	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐵}
Theorem	sneqd 3415	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} = {𝐵})
Theorem	dfsn2 3416	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐴}
Theorem	elsng 3417	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn 3418	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	velsn 3419	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)
Theorem	elsni 3420	There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	dfpr2 3421*	Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵)}
Theorem	elprg 3422	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	elpr 3423	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpr2 3424	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	elpri 3425	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
Theorem	nelpri 3426	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	snidg 3427	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snidb 3428	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	snid 3429	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
Theorem	vsnid 3430	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
⊢ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥}
Theorem	elsn2g 3431	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	elsn2 3432	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that 𝐵, rather than 𝐴, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	mosn 3433*	A singleton has at most one element. This works whether 𝐴 is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3513 and snprc 3462. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}
Theorem	ralsnsg 3434*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	ralsns 3435*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	rexsns 3436*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	rexsnsOLD 3437*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) Obsolete as of 22-Aug-2018. Use rexsns 3436 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	ralsng 3438*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsng 3439*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	exsnrex 3440	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑀 = {𝑥} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 𝑀 = {𝑥})
Theorem	ralsn 3441*	Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	rexsn 3442*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	eltpg 3443	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷)))
Theorem	eltpi 3444	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	eltp 3445	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐷))
Theorem	dftp2 3446*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	nfpr 3447	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	ralprg 3448*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	rexprg 3449*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)))
Theorem	raltpg 3450*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	rextpg 3451*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))
Theorem	ralpr 3452*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	rexpr 3453*	Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
Theorem	raltp 3454*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	rextp 3455*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜃))
Theorem	sbcsng 3456*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑))
Theorem	nfsn 3457	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝐴}
Theorem	csbsng 3458	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
Theorem	disjsn 3459	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjsn2 3460	Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → ({𝐴} ∩ {𝐵}) = ∅)
Theorem	disjpr2 3461	The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∩ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ∅)
Theorem	snprc 3462	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} = ∅)
Theorem	r19.12sn 3463*	Special case of r19.12 2439 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ {𝐴}𝜑)
Theorem	rabsn 3464*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 = 𝐵} = {𝐵})
Theorem	rabrsndc 3465*	A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ DECID 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 = {𝑥 ∈ {𝐴} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑀 = ∅ ∨ 𝑀 = {𝐴}))
Theorem	euabsn2 3466*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
Theorem	euabsn 3467	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥})
Theorem	reusn 3468*	A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦})
Theorem	absneu 3469	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rabsneu 3470	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐴}) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	eusn 3471*	Two ways to express "𝐴 is a singleton." (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥})
Theorem	rabsnt 3472*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵} → 𝜓)
Theorem	prcom 3473	Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐵, 𝐴}
Theorem	preq1 3474	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	preq2 3475	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵})
Theorem	preq12 3476	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) → {𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	preq1i 3477	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶}
Theorem	preq2i 3478	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵}
Theorem	preq12i 3479	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷}
Theorem	preq1d 3480	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	preq2d 3481	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐵})
Theorem	preq12d 3482	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpeq1 3483	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpeq2 3484	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpeq3 3485	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵})
Theorem	tpeq1d 3486	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpeq2d 3487	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐴, 𝐷} = {𝐶, 𝐵, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpeq3d 3488	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴} = {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐵})
Theorem	tpeq123d 3489	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐸} = {𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐹})
Theorem	tprot 3490	Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐴}
Theorem	tpcoma 3491	Swap 1st and 2nd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶}
Theorem	tpcomb 3492	Swap 2nd and 3rd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐵}
Theorem	tpass 3493	Split off the first element of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	qdass 3494	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ({𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∪ {𝐷})
Theorem	qdassr 3495	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∪ {𝐶, 𝐷}) = ({𝐴} ∪ {𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷})
Theorem	tpidm12 3496	Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐵} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐵} = {𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	tpidm13 3497	Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐴} = {𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	tpidm23 3498	Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐵} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴, 𝐵}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐵} = {𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	tpidm 3499	Unordered triple {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐴} is just an overlong way to write {𝐴}. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐴, 𝐴} = {𝐴}
Theorem	tppreq3 3500	An unordered triple is an unordered pair if one of its elements is identical with another element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} = {𝐴, 𝐵})