P. 50 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4901-5000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	relcnvfld 4901	if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅)
Theorem	dfdm2 4902	Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4401 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴)
Theorem	unixpm 4903*	The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	unixp0im 4904	The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ → ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	cnvexg 4905	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvex 4906	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	relcnvexb 4907	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	ressn 4908	Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵}))
Theorem	cnviinm 4909*	The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnvpom 4910*	The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	cnvsom 4911*	The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴))
Theorem	coexg 4912	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	coex 4913	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	xpcom 4914*	Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶))
2.6.7  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 4915	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	iotajust 4916*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 4917. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
Definition	df-iota 4917*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑," where 𝜑 ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 4928); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 4932). Russell used the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 4940 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}}
Theorem	dfiota2 4918*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	nfiota1 4919	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotadxy 4920*	Deduction version of nfiotaxy 4921. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiotaxy 4921*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	cbviota 4922	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotav 4923*	Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	sb8iota 4924	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 1956. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iotaeq 4925	Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	iotabi 4926	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	uniabio 4927*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotaval 4928*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni 4929	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotaint 4930	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota1 4931	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 4932	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	euiotaex 4933	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	iotass 4934*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	iota4 4935	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 4936	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 4937*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 4938*	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 4939	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 4940	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 4917). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 4941	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 4942*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2 4943*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	sniota 4944	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	csbiotag 4945*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 4946	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 4947	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 4948	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 4949	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 4950	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 4951	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 4952	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.")
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 4953	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.)
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 4954	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 4982). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 3859 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3861). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 4955), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 4956), a one-to-one function (df-f1 4957), an onto function (df-fo 4958), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 4959). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 4962, dffun4 4963, dffun6 4966, dffun7 4978, dffun8 4979, and dffun9 4980. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))
Definition	df-fn 4955	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f 4956	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1 4957	Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
Definition	df-fo 4958	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1o 4959	Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Definition	df-fv 4960*	Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, ( I ‘∅) = ∅. Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3861), but this is not required. For example, F = { ⟨ 2 , 6 ⟩, ⟨ 3 , 9 ⟩ } -> ( F ‘ 3 ) = 9 . We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e. "𝐹 of 𝐴," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-isom 4961*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵." Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dffun2 4962*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun4 4963*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun5r 4964*	A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 1995. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	dffun6f 4965*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun6 4966*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	funmo 4967*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	dffun4f 4968*	Definition of function like dffun4 4963 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	funrel 4969	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	funss 4970	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴))
Theorem	funeq 4971	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	funeqi 4972	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)
Theorem	funeqd 4973	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	nffun 4974	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹
Theorem	sbcfung 4975	Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	funeu 4976*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funeu2 4977*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	dffun7 4978*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one." However, dffun8 4979 shows that it doesn't matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun8 4979*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 4978. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun9 4980*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	funfn 4981	An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴)
Theorem	funi 4982	The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun I
Theorem	nfunv 4983	The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ¬ Fun V
Theorem	funopg 4984	A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	funopab 4985*	A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.)
⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	funopabeq 4986*	A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴}
Theorem	funopab4 4987*	A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 3861 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴)}
Theorem	funmpt 4988	A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	funmpt2 4989	Functionality of a class given by a "maps to" notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐹
Theorem	funco 4990	The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → Fun (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	funres 4991	A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funssres 4992	The restriction of a function to the domain of a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ dom 𝐺) = 𝐺)
Theorem	fun2ssres 4993	Equality of restrictions of a function and a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funun 4994	The union of functions with disjoint domains is a function. Theorem 4.6 of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) = ∅) → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺))
Theorem	funcnvsn 4995	The converse singleton of an ordered pair is a function. This is equivalent to funsn 4998 via cnvsn 4853, but stating it this way allows us to skip the sethood assumptions on 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Fun ◡{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funsng 4996	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	fnsng 4997	Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} Fn {𝐴})
Theorem	funsn 4998	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funinsn 4999	A function based on the singleton of an ordered pair. Unlike funsng 4996, this holds even if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is a proper class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Apr-2022.)
⊢ Fun ({⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑊))
Theorem	funprg 5000	A set of two pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩})