P. 50 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4901-5000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sb8iota 4901	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 1929. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iotaeq 4902	Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	iotabi 4903	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	uniabio 4904*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotaval 4905*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni 4906	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotaint 4907	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota1 4908	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 4909	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	euiotaex 4910	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	iotass 4911*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	iota4 4912	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 4913	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 4914*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 4915*	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 4916	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 4917	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 4894). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 4918	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 4919*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2 4920*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	sniota 4921	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	csbiotag 4922*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 4923	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 4924	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 4925	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 4926	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 4927	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 4928	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 4929	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.")
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 4930	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.)
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 4931	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 4959). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 3845 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3847). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 4932), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 4933), a one-to-one function (df-f1 4934), an onto function (df-fo 4935), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 4936). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 4939, dffun4 4940, dffun6 4943, dffun7 4955, dffun8 4956, and dffun9 4957. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))
Definition	df-fn 4932	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f 4933	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1 4934	Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
Definition	df-fo 4935	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1o 4936	Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Definition	df-fv 4937*	Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, ( I ‘∅) = ∅. Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3847), but this is not required. For example, F = { ⟨ 2 , 6 ⟩, ⟨ 3 , 9 ⟩ } -> ( F ‘ 3 ) = 9 . We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e. "𝐹 of 𝐴," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-isom 4938*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵." Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dffun2 4939*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun4 4940*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun5r 4941*	A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 1968. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	dffun6f 4942*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun6 4943*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	funmo 4944*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	dffun4f 4945*	Definition of function like dffun4 4940 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	funrel 4946	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	funss 4947	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴))
Theorem	funeq 4948	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	funeqi 4949	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)
Theorem	funeqd 4950	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	nffun 4951	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹
Theorem	sbcfung 4952	Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	funeu 4953*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funeu2 4954*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	dffun7 4955*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one." However, dffun8 4956 shows that it doesn't matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun8 4956*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 4955. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun9 4957*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	funfn 4958	An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴)
Theorem	funi 4959	The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun I
Theorem	nfunv 4960	The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ¬ Fun V
Theorem	funopg 4961	A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	funopab 4962*	A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.)
⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	funopabeq 4963*	A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴}
Theorem	funopab4 4964*	A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 3847 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴)}
Theorem	funmpt 4965	A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	funmpt2 4966	Functionality of a class given by a "maps to" notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐹
Theorem	funco 4967	The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → Fun (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	funres 4968	A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funssres 4969	The restriction of a function to the domain of a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ dom 𝐺) = 𝐺)
Theorem	fun2ssres 4970	Equality of restrictions of a function and a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funun 4971	The union of functions with disjoint domains is a function. Theorem 4.6 of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) = ∅) → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺))
Theorem	funcnvsn 4972	The converse singleton of an ordered pair is a function. This is equivalent to funsn 4975 via cnvsn 4830, but stating it this way allows us to skip the sethood assumptions on 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Fun ◡{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funsng 4973	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	fnsng 4974	Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} Fn {𝐴})
Theorem	funsn 4975	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funprg 4976	A set of two pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩})
Theorem	funtpg 4977	A set of three pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → Fun {⟨𝑋, 𝐴⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝐶⟩})
Theorem	funpr 4978	A function with a domain of two elements. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩})
Theorem	funtp 4979	A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐹⟩})
Theorem	fnsn 4980	Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} Fn {𝐴}
Theorem	fnprg 4981	Function with a domain of two different values. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	fntpg 4982	Function with a domain of three different values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → {⟨𝑋, 𝐴⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝐶⟩} Fn {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍})
Theorem	fntp 4983	A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐹⟩} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	fun0 4984	The empty set is a function. Theorem 10.3 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun ∅
Theorem	funcnvcnv 4985	The double converse of a function is a function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Fun ◡◡𝐴)
Theorem	funcnv2 4986*	A simpler equivalence for single-rooted (see funcnv 4987). (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnv 4987*	The converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-rooted, which means that for any 𝑦 in the range of 𝐴 there is at most one 𝑥 such that 𝑥𝐴𝑦. Definition of single-rooted in [Enderton] p. 43. See funcnv2 4986 for a simpler version. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnv3 4988*	A condition showing a class is single-rooted. (See funcnv 4987). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃!𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnveq 4989*	Another way of expressing that a class is single-rooted. Counterpart to dffun2 4939. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	fun2cnv 4990*	The double converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-valued. Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23, who use the notation "Un(A)" for single-valued. Note that 𝐴 is not necessarily a function. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	svrelfun 4991	A single-valued relation is a function. (See fun2cnv 4990 for "single-valued.") Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡◡𝐴))
Theorem	fncnv 4992*	Single-rootedness (see funcnv 4987) of a class cut down by a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (◡(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) Fn 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	fun11 4993*	Two ways of stating that 𝐴 is one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24, who use the notation "Un2 (A)" for one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((Fun ◡◡𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑤) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
Theorem	fununi 4994*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of functions is a function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	funcnvuni 4995*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 4987 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	fun11uni 4996*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	funin 4997	The intersection with a function is a function. Exercise 14(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺))
Theorem	funres11 4998	The restriction of a one-to-one function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funcnvres 4999	The converse of a restricted function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (◡𝐹 ↾ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)))
Theorem	cnvresid 5000	Converse of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by FL, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ◡( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)