HomeHome Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
Theorem List (p. 63 of 110)
< Previous  Next >
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version.

Mirrors  >  Metamath Home Page  >  ILE Home Page  >  Theorem List Contents  >  Recent Proofs       This page: Page List

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)
TypeLabelDescription
Statement
 
Theoremswoord1 6201* The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < < ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦𝑋𝑧𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑋𝑦𝑋𝑧𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐶𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑅𝐵)       (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 𝐶𝐵 < 𝐶))
 
Theoremswoord2 6202* The incomparability equivalence relation is compatible with the original order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.)
𝑅 = ((𝑋 × 𝑋) ∖ ( < < ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦𝑋𝑧𝑋)) → (𝑦 < 𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧 < 𝑦))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥𝑋𝑦𝑋𝑧𝑋)) → (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (𝑥 < 𝑧𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐶𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑅𝐵)       (𝜑 → (𝐶 < 𝐴𝐶 < 𝐵))
 
Theoremeqerlem 6203* Lemma for eqer 6204. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}       (𝑧𝑅𝑤𝑧 / 𝑥𝐴 = 𝑤 / 𝑥𝐴)
 
Theoremeqer 6204* Equivalence relation involving equality of dependent classes 𝐴(𝑥) and 𝐵(𝑦). (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵}       𝑅 Er V
 
Theoremider 6205 The identity relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
I Er V
 
Theorem0er 6206 The empty set is an equivalence relation on the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2015.)
∅ Er ∅
 
Theoremeceq1 6207 Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
 
Theoremeceq1d 6208 Equality theorem for equivalence class (deduction form). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2019.)
(𝜑𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝐶 = [𝐵]𝐶)
 
Theoremeceq2 6209 Equality theorem for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐶]𝐴 = [𝐶]𝐵)
 
Theoremelecg 6210 Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
((𝐴𝑉𝐵𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅𝐵𝑅𝐴))
 
Theoremelec 6211 Membership in an equivalence class. Theorem 72 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐵 ∈ V       (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅𝐵𝑅𝐴)
 
Theoremrelelec 6212 Membership in an equivalence class when 𝑅 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
(Rel 𝑅 → (𝐴 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅𝐵𝑅𝐴))
 
Theoremecss 6213 An equivalence class is a subset of the domain. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)       (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅𝑋)
 
Theoremecdmn0m 6214* A representative of an inhabited equivalence class belongs to the domain of the equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
(𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
 
Theoremereldm 6215 Equality of equivalence classes implies equivalence of domain membership. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)       (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋))
 
Theoremerth 6216 Basic property of equivalence relations. Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑋)       (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
 
Theoremerth2 6217 Basic property of equivalence relations. Compare Theorem 73 of [Suppes] p. 82. Assumes membership of the second argument in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jul-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑋)       (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
 
Theoremerthi 6218 Basic property of equivalence relations. Part of Lemma 3N of [Enderton] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑅𝐵)       (𝜑 → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
 
Theoremecidsn 6219 An equivalence class modulo the identity relation is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-2004.)
[𝐴] I = {𝐴}
 
Theoremqseq1 6220 Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 / 𝐶) = (𝐵 / 𝐶))
 
Theoremqseq2 6221 Equality theorem for quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 / 𝐴) = (𝐶 / 𝐵))
 
Theoremelqsg 6222* Closed form of elqs 6223. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 12-Oct-2010.)
(𝐵𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅))
 
Theoremelqs 6223* Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
𝐵 ∈ V       (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑥𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
 
Theoremelqsi 6224* Membership in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
(𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) → ∃𝑥𝐴 𝐵 = [𝑥]𝑅)
 
Theoremecelqsg 6225 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
((𝑅𝑉𝐵𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
 
Theoremecelqsi 6226 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝑅 ∈ V       (𝐵𝐴 → [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅))
 
Theoremecopqsi 6227 "Closure" law for equivalence class of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1996.)
𝑅 ∈ V    &   𝑆 = ((𝐴 × 𝐴) / 𝑅)       ((𝐵𝐴𝐶𝐴) → [⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩]𝑅𝑆)
 
Theoremqsexg 6228 A quotient set exists. (Contributed by FL, 19-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
(𝐴𝑉 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V)
 
Theoremqsex 6229 A quotient set exists. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
𝐴 ∈ V       (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∈ V
 
Theoremuniqs 6230 The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Dec-2008.)
(𝑅𝑉 (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝑅𝐴))
 
Theoremqsss 6231 A quotient set is a set of subsets of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝐴)       (𝜑 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴)
 
Theoremuniqs2 6232 The union of a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jul-2014.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   (𝜑𝑅𝑉)       (𝜑 (𝐴 / 𝑅) = 𝐴)
 
Theoremsnec 6233 The singleton of an equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝐴 ∈ V       {[𝐴]𝑅} = ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
 
Theoremecqs 6234 Equivalence class in terms of quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1999.)
𝑅 ∈ V       [𝐴]𝑅 = ({𝐴} / 𝑅)
 
Theoremecid 6235 A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝐴 ∈ V       [𝐴] E = 𝐴
 
Theoremecidg 6236 A set is equal to its converse epsilon coset. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2020.)
(𝐴𝑉 → [𝐴] E = 𝐴)
 
Theoremqsid 6237 A set is equal to its quotient set mod converse epsilon. (Note: converse epsilon is not an equivalence relation.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
(𝐴 / E ) = 𝐴
 
Theoremectocld 6238* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))    &   ((𝜒𝑥𝐵) → 𝜑)       ((𝜒𝐴𝑆) → 𝜓)
 
Theoremectocl 6239* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝑆 = (𝐵 / 𝑅)    &   ([𝑥]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))    &   (𝑥𝐵𝜑)       (𝐴𝑆𝜓)
 
Theoremelqsn0m 6240* An element of a quotient set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Aug-2019.)
((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐵)
 
Theoremelqsn0 6241 A quotient set doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
 
Theoremecelqsdm 6242 Membership of an equivalence class in a quotient set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-1995.)
((dom 𝑅 = 𝐴 ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅)) → 𝐵𝐴)
 
Theoremxpiderm 6243* A square Cartesian product is an equivalence relation (in general it's not a poset). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Aug-2019.)
(∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) Er 𝐴)
 
Theoremiinerm 6244* The intersection of a nonempty family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
((∃𝑦 𝑦𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → 𝑥𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵)
 
Theoremriinerm 6245* The relative intersection of a family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
((∃𝑦 𝑦𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥𝐴 𝑅 Er 𝐵) → ((𝐵 × 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥𝐴 𝑅) Er 𝐵)
 
Theoremerinxp 6246 A restricted equivalence relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
(𝜑𝑅 Er 𝐴)    &   (𝜑𝐵𝐴)       (𝜑 → (𝑅 ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) Er 𝐵)
 
Theoremecinxp 6247 Restrict the relation in an equivalence class to a base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.)
(((𝑅𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴𝐵𝐴) → [𝐵]𝑅 = [𝐵](𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)))
 
Theoremqsinxp 6248 Restrict the equivalence relation in a quotient set to the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.)
((𝑅𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 / 𝑅) = (𝐴 / (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴))))
 
Theoremqsel 6249 If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
((𝑅 Er 𝑋𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 / 𝑅) ∧ 𝐶𝐵) → 𝐵 = [𝐶]𝑅)
 
Theoremqliftlem 6250* 𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 / 𝑅))
 
Theoremqliftrel 6251* 𝐹, a function lift, is a subset of 𝑅 × 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       (𝜑𝐹 ⊆ ((𝑋 / 𝑅) × 𝑌))
 
Theoremqliftel 6252* Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       (𝜑 → ([𝐶]𝑅𝐹𝐷 ↔ ∃𝑥𝑋 (𝐶𝑅𝑥𝐷 = 𝐴)))
 
Theoremqliftel1 6253* Elementhood in the relation 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → [𝑥]𝑅𝐹𝐴)
 
Theoremqliftfun 6254* The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦𝐴 = 𝐵)))
 
Theoremqliftfund 6255* The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑅𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)       (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
 
Theoremqliftfuns 6256* The function 𝐹 is the unique function defined by 𝐹‘[𝑥] = 𝐴, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑦𝑧(𝑦𝑅𝑧𝑦 / 𝑥𝐴 = 𝑧 / 𝑥𝐴)))
 
Theoremqliftf 6257* The domain and range of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)       (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹𝐹:(𝑋 / 𝑅)⟶𝑌))
 
Theoremqliftval 6258* The value of the function 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
𝐹 = ran (𝑥𝑋 ↦ ⟨[𝑥]𝑅, 𝐴⟩)    &   ((𝜑𝑥𝑋) → 𝐴𝑌)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑋 ∈ V)    &   (𝑥 = 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)       ((𝜑𝐶𝑋) → (𝐹‘[𝐶]𝑅) = 𝐵)
 
Theoremecoptocl 6259* Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class of ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
𝑆 = ((𝐵 × 𝐶) / 𝑅)    &   ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))    &   ((𝑥𝐵𝑦𝐶) → 𝜑)       (𝐴𝑆𝜓)
 
Theorem2ecoptocl 6260* Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
𝑆 = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))    &   ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))    &   (((𝑥𝐶𝑦𝐷) ∧ (𝑧𝐶𝑤𝐷)) → 𝜑)       ((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆) → 𝜒)
 
Theorem3ecoptocl 6261* Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
𝑆 = ((𝐷 × 𝐷) / 𝑅)    &   ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩]𝑅 = 𝐴 → (𝜑𝜓))    &   ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩]𝑅 = 𝐵 → (𝜓𝜒))    &   ([⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩]𝑅 = 𝐶 → (𝜒𝜃))    &   (((𝑥𝐷𝑦𝐷) ∧ (𝑧𝐷𝑤𝐷) ∧ (𝑣𝐷𝑢𝐷)) → 𝜑)       ((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆𝐶𝑆) → 𝜃)
 
Theorembrecop 6262* Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
∈ V    &    Er (𝐺 × 𝐺)    &   𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / )    &    = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝐻𝑦𝐻) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] 𝑦 = [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   ((((𝑧𝐺𝑤𝐺) ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐵𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑣𝐺𝑢𝐺) ∧ (𝐶𝐺𝐷𝐺))) → (([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] = [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∧ [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] = [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ) → (𝜑𝜓)))       (((𝐴𝐺𝐵𝐺) ∧ (𝐶𝐺𝐷𝐺)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] 𝜓))
 
Theoremeroveu 6263* Lemma for eroprf 6265. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   (𝜑𝑇𝑍)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝐶𝑊)    &   (𝜑+ :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟𝐴𝑠𝐴) ∧ (𝑡𝐵𝑢𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))       ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑋𝐽𝑌𝐾)) → ∃!𝑧𝑝𝐴𝑞𝐵 ((𝑋 = [𝑝]𝑅𝑌 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))
 
Theoremerovlem 6264* Lemma for eroprf 6265. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   (𝜑𝑇𝑍)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝐶𝑊)    &   (𝜑+ :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟𝐴𝑠𝐴) ∧ (𝑡𝐵𝑢𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &    = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝𝐴𝑞𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}       (𝜑 = (𝑥𝐽, 𝑦𝐾 ↦ (℩𝑧𝑝𝐴𝑞𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇))))
 
Theoremeroprf 6265* Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
𝐽 = (𝐴 / 𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (𝐵 / 𝑆)    &   (𝜑𝑇𝑍)    &   (𝜑𝑅 Er 𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝑆 Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝑇 Er 𝑊)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝐵𝑉)    &   (𝜑𝐶𝑊)    &   (𝜑+ :(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟𝐴𝑠𝐴) ∧ (𝑡𝐵𝑢𝐵))) → ((𝑟𝑅𝑠𝑡𝑆𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡)𝑇(𝑠 + 𝑢)))    &    = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝𝐴𝑞𝐵 ((𝑥 = [𝑝]𝑅𝑦 = [𝑞]𝑆) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)]𝑇)}    &   (𝜑𝑅𝑋)    &   (𝜑𝑆𝑌)    &   𝐿 = (𝐶 / 𝑇)       (𝜑 :(𝐽 × 𝐾)⟶𝐿)
 
Theoremeroprf2 6266* Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
𝐽 = (𝐴 / )    &    = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑝𝐴𝑞𝐴 ((𝑥 = [𝑝] 𝑦 = [𝑞] ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(𝑝 + 𝑞)] )}    &   (𝜑𝑋)    &   (𝜑 Er 𝑈)    &   (𝜑𝐴𝑈)    &   (𝜑+ :(𝐴 × 𝐴)⟶𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑟𝐴𝑠𝐴) ∧ (𝑡𝐴𝑢𝐴))) → ((𝑟 𝑠𝑡 𝑢) → (𝑟 + 𝑡) (𝑠 + 𝑢)))       (𝜑 :(𝐽 × 𝐽)⟶𝐽)
 
Theoremecopoveq 6267* This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation 𝐹. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}       (((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆) ∧ (𝐶𝑆𝐷𝑆)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) = (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
 
Theoremecopovsym 6268* Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)       (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴)
 
Theoremecopovtrn 6269* Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))       ((𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐶) → 𝐴 𝐶)
 
Theoremecopover 6270* Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥)    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))        Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
 
Theoremecopovsymg 6271* Assuming the operation 𝐹 is commutative, show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))       (𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐴)
 
Theoremecopovtrng 6272* Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆𝑧𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆𝑧𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))       ((𝐴 𝐵𝐵 𝐶) → 𝐴 𝐶)
 
Theoremecopoverg 6273* Assuming that operation 𝐹 is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation , specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
= {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 + 𝑢) = (𝑤 + 𝑣)))}    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆𝑧𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   ((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆𝑧𝑆) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑥 + 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))        Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)
 
Theoremth3qlem1 6274* Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
Er 𝑆    &   (((𝑦𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑣𝑆)) → ((𝑦 𝑤𝑧 𝑣) → (𝑦 + 𝑧) (𝑤 + 𝑣)))       ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑆 / ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑆 / )) → ∃*𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝐴 = [𝑦] 𝐵 = [𝑧] ) ∧ 𝑥 = [(𝑦 + 𝑧)] ))
 
Theoremth3qlem2 6275* Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
∈ V    &    Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ((((𝑤𝑆𝑣𝑆) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝑡𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠𝑆𝑓𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓𝑔, ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑠, 𝑓⟩) (⟨𝑢, 𝑡+𝑔, ⟩)))       ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )) → ∃*𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢𝑡((𝐴 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] 𝐵 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ))
 
Theoremth3qcor 6276* Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
∈ V    &    Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ((((𝑤𝑆𝑣𝑆) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝑡𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠𝑆𝑓𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓𝑔, ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑠, 𝑓⟩) (⟨𝑢, 𝑡+𝑔, ⟩)))    &   𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )) ∧ ∃𝑤𝑣𝑢𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ))}       Fun 𝐺
 
Theoremth3q 6277* Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
∈ V    &    Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ((((𝑤𝑆𝑣𝑆) ∧ (𝑢𝑆𝑡𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑠𝑆𝑓𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆))) → ((⟨𝑤, 𝑣𝑢, 𝑡⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑠, 𝑓𝑔, ⟩) → (⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑠, 𝑓⟩) (⟨𝑢, 𝑡+𝑔, ⟩)))    &   𝐺 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )) ∧ ∃𝑤𝑣𝑢𝑡((𝑥 = [⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩] 𝑦 = [⟨𝑢, 𝑡⟩] ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑤, 𝑣+𝑢, 𝑡⟩)] ))}       (((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆) ∧ (𝐶𝑆𝐷𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] 𝐺[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ) = [(⟨𝐴, 𝐵+𝐶, 𝐷⟩)] )
 
Theoremoviec 6278* Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
(((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆) ∧ (𝐶𝑆𝐷𝑆)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   (((𝑎𝑆𝑏𝑆) ∧ (𝑔𝑆𝑆)) → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &   (((𝑐𝑆𝑑𝑆) ∧ (𝑡𝑆𝑠𝑆)) → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆))    &    ∈ V    &    Er (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &    = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧𝑤𝑣𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ 𝜑))}    &   (((𝑧 = 𝑎𝑤 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑐𝑢 = 𝑑)) → (𝜑𝜓))    &   (((𝑧 = 𝑔𝑤 = ) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝑡𝑢 = 𝑠)) → (𝜑𝜒))    &    + = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑤𝑣𝑢𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐽))}    &   (((𝑤 = 𝑎𝑣 = 𝑏) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑔𝑓 = )) → 𝐽 = 𝐾)    &   (((𝑤 = 𝑐𝑣 = 𝑑) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝑡𝑓 = 𝑠)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   (((𝑤 = 𝐴𝑣 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑢 = 𝐶𝑓 = 𝐷)) → 𝐽 = 𝐻)    &    = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥𝑄𝑦𝑄) ∧ ∃𝑎𝑏𝑐𝑑((𝑥 = [⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩] 𝑦 = [⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩] ) ∧ 𝑧 = [(⟨𝑎, 𝑏+𝑐, 𝑑⟩)] ))}    &   𝑄 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   ((((𝑎𝑆𝑏𝑆) ∧ (𝑐𝑆𝑑𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑔𝑆𝑆) ∧ (𝑡𝑆𝑠𝑆))) → ((𝜓𝜒) → 𝐾 𝐿))       (((𝐴𝑆𝐵𝑆) ∧ (𝐶𝑆𝐷𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ) = [𝐻] )
 
Theoremecovcom 6279* Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6280 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] )    &   𝐷 = 𝐻    &   𝐺 = 𝐽       ((𝐴𝐶𝐵𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
 
Theoremecovicom 6280* Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
𝐶 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝐷, 𝐺⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → 𝐷 = 𝐻)    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → 𝐺 = 𝐽)       ((𝐴𝐶𝐵𝐶) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴))
 
Theoremecovass 6281* Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6282 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] )    &   (((𝐺𝑆𝐻𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑁𝑆𝑄𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻𝑆))    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑁𝑆𝑄𝑆))    &   𝐽 = 𝐿    &   𝐾 = 𝑀       ((𝐴𝐷𝐵𝐷𝐶𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
 
Theoremecoviass 6282* Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] )    &   (((𝐺𝑆𝐻𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝐽, 𝐾⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑁𝑆𝑄𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] + [⟨𝑁, 𝑄⟩] ) = [⟨𝐿, 𝑀⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻𝑆))    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑁𝑆𝑄𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)       ((𝐴𝐷𝐵𝐷𝐶𝐷) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
 
Theoremecovdi 6283* Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6284 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑀𝑆𝑁𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] )    &   (((𝑊𝑆𝑋𝑆) ∧ (𝑌𝑆𝑍𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] + [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] ) = [⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑀𝑆𝑁𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → (𝑊𝑆𝑋𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑌𝑆𝑍𝑆))    &   𝐻 = 𝐾    &   𝐽 = 𝐿       ((𝐴𝐷𝐵𝐷𝐶𝐷) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
 
Theoremecovidi 6284* Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
𝐷 = ((𝑆 × 𝑆) / )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] + [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑀𝑆𝑁𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩] ) = [⟨𝐻, 𝐽⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩] ) = [⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] )    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩] · [⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩] ) = [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] )    &   (((𝑊𝑆𝑋𝑆) ∧ (𝑌𝑆𝑍𝑆)) → ([⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩] + [⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩] ) = [⟨𝐾, 𝐿⟩] )    &   (((𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑀𝑆𝑁𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆)) → (𝑊𝑆𝑋𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → (𝑌𝑆𝑍𝑆))    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → 𝐻 = 𝐾)    &   (((𝑥𝑆𝑦𝑆) ∧ (𝑧𝑆𝑤𝑆) ∧ (𝑣𝑆𝑢𝑆)) → 𝐽 = 𝐿)       ((𝐴𝐷𝐵𝐷𝐶𝐷) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
 
2.6.25  Equinumerosity
 
Syntaxcen 6285 Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class
 
Syntaxcdom 6286 Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class
 
Syntaxcfn 6287 Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
 
Definitiondf-en 6288* Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6294. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
≈ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥1-1-onto𝑦}
 
Definitiondf-dom 6289* Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6297 and domen 6298. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
≼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥1-1𝑦}
 
Definitiondf-fin 6290* Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 10929. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥𝑦}
 
Theoremrelen 6291 Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
Rel ≈
 
Theoremreldom 6292 Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
Rel ≼
 
Theoremencv 6293 If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
(𝐴𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
 
Theorembren 6294* Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
(𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴1-1-onto𝐵)
 
Theorembrdomg 6295* Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
(𝐵𝐶 → (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴1-1𝐵))
 
Theorembrdomi 6296* Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
(𝐴𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴1-1𝐵)
 
Theorembrdom 6297* Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
𝐵 ∈ V       (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴1-1𝐵)
 
Theoremdomen 6298* Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
𝐵 ∈ V       (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑥𝐵))
 
Theoremdomeng 6299* Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
(𝐵𝐶 → (𝐴𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑥𝑥𝐵)))
 
Theoremctex 6300 A countable set is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
(𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V)
    < Previous  Next >

Page List
Jump to page: Contents  1 1-100 2 101-200 3 201-300 4 301-400 5 401-500 6 501-600 7 601-700 8 701-800 9 801-900 10 901-1000 11 1001-1100 12 1101-1200 13 1201-1300 14 1301-1400 15 1401-1500 16 1501-1600 17 1601-1700 18 1701-1800 19 1801-1900 20 1901-2000 21 2001-2100 22 2101-2200 23 2201-2300 24 2301-2400 25 2401-2500 26 2501-2600 27 2601-2700 28 2701-2800 29 2801-2900 30 2901-3000 31 3001-3100 32 3101-3200 33 3201-3300 34 3301-3400 35 3401-3500 36 3501-3600 37 3601-3700 38 3701-3800 39 3801-3900 40 3901-4000 41 4001-4100 42 4101-4200 43 4201-4300 44 4301-4400 45 4401-4500 46 4501-4600 47 4601-4700 48 4701-4800 49 4801-4900 50 4901-5000 51 5001-5100 52 5101-5200 53 5201-5300 54 5301-5400 55 5401-5500 56 5501-5600 57 5601-5700 58 5701-5800 59 5801-5900 60 5901-6000 61 6001-6100 62 6101-6200 63 6201-6300 64 6301-6400 65 6401-6500 66 6501-6600 67 6601-6700 68 6701-6800 69 6801-6900 70 6901-7000 71 7001-7100 72 7101-7200 73 7201-7300 74 7301-7400 75 7401-7500 76 7501-7600 77 7601-7700 78 7701-7800 79 7801-7900 80 7901-8000 81 8001-8100 82 8101-8200 83 8201-8300 84 8301-8400 85 8401-8500 86 8501-8600 87 8601-8700 88 8701-8800 89 8801-8900 90 8901-9000 91 9001-9100 92 9101-9200 93 9201-9300 94 9301-9400 95 9401-9500 96 9501-9600 97 9601-9700 98 9701-9800 99 9801-9900 100 9901-10000 101 10001-10100 102 10101-10200 103 10201-10300 104 10301-10400 105 10401-10500 106 10501-10600 107 10601-10700 108 10701-10800 109 10801-10900 110 10901-10953
  Copyright terms: Public domain < Previous  Next >