P. 64 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6301-6400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	domentr 6301	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaeng 6302	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaen2g 6303	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6304 does not need ax-setind 4289.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	f1imaen 6304	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶)
Theorem	en0 6305	The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	ensn1 6306	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝐴} ≈ 1𝑜
Theorem	ensn1g 6307	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ≈ 1𝑜)
Theorem	enpr1g 6308	{𝐴, 𝐴} has only one element. (Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴, 𝐴} ≈ 1𝑜)
Theorem	en1 6309*	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1𝑜 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥})
Theorem	en1bg 6310	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ≈ 1𝑜 ↔ 𝐴 = {∪ 𝐴}))
Theorem	reuen1 6311*	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1𝑜)
Theorem	euen1 6312	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1𝑜)
Theorem	euen1b 6313*	Two ways to express "𝐴 has a unique element". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1𝑜 ↔ ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	en1uniel 6314	A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ≈ 1𝑜 → ∪ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	2dom 6315*	A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (2𝑜 ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	fundmen 6316	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹)
Theorem	fundmeng 6317	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐹) → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹)
Theorem	cnven 6318	A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ≈ ◡𝐴)
Theorem	fndmeng 6319	A function is equinumerate to its domain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐹)
Theorem	en2sn 6320	Two singletons are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴} ≈ {𝐵})
Theorem	snfig 6321	A singleton is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ Fin)
Theorem	fiprc 6322	The class of finite sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 3-Oct-2008.)
⊢ Fin ∉ V
Theorem	unen 6323	Equinumerosity of union of disjoint sets. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	enm 6324*	A set equinumerous to an inhabited set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpsnen 6325	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton. Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴
Theorem	xpsneng 6326	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton. Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	xp1en 6327	One times a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 1𝑜) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	endisj 6328*	Any two sets are equinumerous to disjoint sets. Exercise 4.39 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ≈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
Theorem	xpcomf1o 6329*	The canonical bijection from (𝐴 × 𝐵) to (𝐵 × 𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xpcomco 6330*	Composition with the bijection of xpcomf1o 6329 swaps the arguments to a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	xpcomen 6331	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xpcomeng 6332	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	xpsnen2g 6333	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton on the left. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝐴} × 𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpassen 6334	Associative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(e) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpdom2 6335	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Proposition 10.33(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom2g 6336	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom1g 6337	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpdom3m 6338*	A set is dominated by its Cartesian product with an inhabited set. Exercise 6 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom1 6339	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by NM, 29-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	fopwdom 6340	Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	enen1 6341	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶))
Theorem	enen2 6342	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domen1 6343	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	domen2 6344	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼ 𝐵))
2.6.26  Pigeonhole Principle
Theorem	phplem1 6345	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem2 6346	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem3 6347	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. For a version without the redundant hypotheses, see phplem3g 6349. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	phplem4 6348	Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	phplem3g 6349	A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 6347 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	nneneq 6350	Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	php5 6351	A natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	snnen2og 6352	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a proper class, see snnen2oprc 6353. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2𝑜)
Theorem	snnen2oprc 6353	A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a set, see snnen2og 6352. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2𝑜)
Theorem	phplem4dom 6354	Dominance of successors implies dominance of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≼ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	php5dom 6355	A natural number does not dominate its successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	nndomo 6356	Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	phpm 6357*	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. By "proper subset" here we mean that there is an element which is in the natural number and not in the subset, or in symbols ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (which is stronger than not being equal in the absence of excluded middle). Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 6345 through phplem4 6348, nneneq 6350, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	phpelm 6358	Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to an element of itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	phplem4on 6359	Equinumerosity of successors of an ordinal and a natural number implies equinumerosity of the originals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
2.6.27  Finite sets
Theorem	fidceq 6360	Equality of members of a finite set is decidable. This may be counterintuitive: cannot any two sets be elements of a finite set? Well, to show, for example, that {𝐵, 𝐶} is finite would require showing it is equinumerous to 1𝑜 or to 2𝑜 but to show that you'd need to know 𝐵 = 𝐶 or ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → DECID 𝐵 = 𝐶)
Theorem	fidifsnen 6361	All decrements of a finite set are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ≈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐵}))
Theorem	fidifsnid 6362	If we remove a single element from a finite set then put it back in, we end up with the original finite set. This strengthens difsnss 3537 from subset to equality when the set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∪ {𝐵}) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnfi 6363	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	enfi 6364	Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin))
Theorem	enfii 6365	A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfiexmid 6366*	If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	dif1en 6367	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	fiunsnnn 6368	Adding one element to a finite set which is equinumerous to a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ≈ suc 𝑁)
Theorem	php5fin 6369	A finite set is not equinumerous to a set which adds one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}))
Theorem	fisbth 6370	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	0fin 6371	The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin
Theorem	fin0 6372*	A nonempty finite set has at least one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	fin0or 6373*	A finite set is either empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	diffitest 6374*	If subtracting any set from a finite set gives a finite set, any proposition of the form ¬ 𝜑 is decidable. This is not a proof of full excluded middle, but it is close enough to show we won't be able to prove 𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ Fin ∀𝑏(𝑎 ∖ 𝑏) ∈ Fin    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	findcard 6375*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 6376*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 6377*	Variation of findcard2 6376 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 6378*	Deduction version of findcard2 6376. If you also need 𝑦 ∈ Fin (which doesn't come for free due to ssfiexmid 6366), use findcard2sd 6379 instead. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	findcard2sd 6379*	Deduction form of finite set induction . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	diffisn 6380	Subtracting a singleton from a finite set produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	diffifi 6381	Subtracting one finite set from another produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ac6sfi 6382*	Existence of a choice function for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.)
⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	fientri3 6383	Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	nnwetri 6384*	A natural number is well-ordered by E. More specifically, this order both satisfies We and is trichotomous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ( E We 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 E 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 E 𝑥)))
Theorem	onunsnss 6385	Adding a singleton to create an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	snon0 6386	An ordinal which is a singleton is {∅}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {𝐴} ∈ On) → 𝐴 = ∅)
2.6.28  Supremum and infimum
Syntax	csup 6387	Extend class notation to include supremum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Syntax	cinf 6388	Extend class notation to include infimum of class 𝐴. Here 𝑅 is ordinarily a relation that strictly orders class 𝐵. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than' and 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers.
class inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Definition	df-sup 6389*	Define the supremum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the supremum exists. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦𝑅𝑧))}
Definition	df-inf 6390	Define the infimum of class 𝐴. It is meaningful when 𝑅 is a relation that strictly orders 𝐵 and when the infimum exists. For example, 𝑅 could be 'less than', 𝐵 could be the set of real numbers, and 𝐴 could be the set of all positive reals; in this case the infimum is 0. The infimum is defined as the supremum using the converse ordering relation. In the given example, 0 is the supremum of all reals (greatest real number) for which all positive reals are greater. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2020.)
⊢ inf(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, ◡𝑅)
Theorem	supeq1 6391	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1d 6392	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq1i 6393	Equality inference for supremum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = sup(𝐶, 𝐴, 𝑅)
Theorem	supeq2 6394	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐶, 𝑅))
Theorem	supeq3 6395	Equality theorem for supremum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅) = sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑆))
Theorem	supeq123d 6396	Equality deduction for supremum. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶) = sup(𝐷, 𝐸, 𝐹))
Theorem	nfsup 6397	Hypothesis builder for supremum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2014.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥sup(𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑅)
Theorem	supmoti 6398*	Any class 𝐵 has at most one supremum in 𝐴 (where 𝑅 is interpreted as 'less than'). The hypothesis is satisfied by real numbers (see lttri3 7156) or other orders which correspond to tight apartnesses. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supeuti 6399*	A supremum is unique. Similar to Theorem I.26 of [Apostol] p. 24 (but for suprema in general). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Theorem	supval2ti 6400*	Alternate expression for the supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))