Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfoprab GIF version

Theorem nfoprab 5588
 Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
nfoprab.1 𝑤𝜑
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfoprab 𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤   𝑦,𝑤   𝑧,𝑤
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem nfoprab
Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-oprab 5547 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2 nfv 1462 . . . . . . 7 𝑤 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧
3 nfoprab.1 . . . . . . 7 𝑤𝜑
42, 3nfan 1498 . . . . . 6 𝑤(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
54nfex 1569 . . . . 5 𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
65nfex 1569 . . . 4 𝑤𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
76nfex 1569 . . 3 𝑤𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
87nfab 2224 . 2 𝑤{𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
91, 8nfcxfr 2217 1 𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1285  Ⅎwnf 1390  ∃wex 1422  {cab 2068  Ⅎwnfc 2207  ⟨cop 3409  {coprab 5544 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-oprab 5547 This theorem is referenced by:  nfmpt2  5604
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator