Theorem nfsb4t 1932

Description: A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 1930). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfsb4t	⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Proof of Theorem nfsb4t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfnf1 1477	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2	1	nfal 1509	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfnae 1651	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦
4	2, 3	nfan 1498	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦)
5		df-nf 1391	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
6	5	albii 1400	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑))
7		hbsb4t 1931	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑) → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
8	6, 7	sylbi 119	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
9	8	imp 122	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
10	4, 9	nfd 1457	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11	10	ex 113	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑧𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∀wal 1283  Ⅎwnf 1390  [wsb 1686

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-fal 1291  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687

This theorem is referenced by:  dvelimdf  1934