Theorem pm4.71 386

Description: Implication in terms of biconditional and conjunction. Theorem *4.71 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Dec-2012.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pm4.71	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem pm4.71

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpl 108	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜑)
2	1	biantru 300	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜑)))
3		anclb 317	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		dfbi2 385	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜑)))
5	2, 3, 4	3bitr4i 211	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116

This theorem is referenced by:  pm4.71r  387  pm4.71i  388  pm4.71d  390  bigolden  939  pm5.75  946  exintrbi  1612  rabid2  2607  dfss2  3086  disj3  3415  dmopab3  4752