Theorem r19.3rm 3446

Description: Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
r19.3rm.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.3rm	⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem r19.3rm

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2200	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑦 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	cbvexv 1890	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2200	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	cbvexv 1890	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		biimt 240	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)))
6		df-ral 2419	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
7		r19.3rm.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
8	7	19.23 1656	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
9	6, 8	bitri 183	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
10	5, 9	syl6bbr 197	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
11	4, 10	sylbi 120	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
12	2, 11	sylbir 134	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329  Ⅎwnf 1436  ∃wex 1468   ∈ wcel 1480  ∀wral 2414

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1437  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-ral 2419

This theorem is referenced by:  r19.28m  3447  r19.3rmv  3448  r19.27m  3453  indstr  9381