Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabid2 | GIF version |
Description: An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabid2 | ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | abeq2 2246 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
2 | pm4.71 386 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
3 | 2 | albii 1446 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
4 | 1, 3 | bitr4i 186 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) |
5 | df-rab 2423 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
6 | 5 | eqeq2i 2148 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
7 | df-ral 2419 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3bitr4i 211 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∀wal 1329 = wceq 1331 ∈ wcel 1480 {cab 2123 ∀wral 2414 {crab 2418 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-11 1484 ax-4 1487 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2119 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-clab 2124 df-cleq 2130 df-clel 2133 df-ral 2419 df-rab 2423 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabxmdc 3389 rabrsndc 3586 class2seteq 4082 dmmptg 5031 dmmptd 5248 fneqeql 5521 fmpt 5563 acexmidlemph 5760 inffiexmid 6793 ssfirab 6815 exmidaclem 7057 ioomax 9724 iccmax 9725 dfphi2 11885 phiprmpw 11887 unennn 11899 znnen 11900 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |