Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  rabun2 GIF version

Theorem rabun2 3250
 Description: Abstraction restricted to a union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
rabun2 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐵𝜑})

Proof of Theorem rabun2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2358 . 2 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
2 df-rab 2358 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
3 df-rab 2358 . . . 4 {𝑥𝐵𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}
42, 3uneq12i 3125 . . 3 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐵𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
5 elun 3114 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
65anbi1i 446 . . . . . 6 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
7 andir 766 . . . . . 6 (((𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
86, 7bitri 182 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)))
98abbii 2195 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))}
10 unab 3238 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐵𝜑))}
119, 10eqtr4i 2105 . . 3 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐵𝜑)})
124, 11eqtr4i 2105 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐵𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}
131, 12eqtr4i 2105 1 {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐵𝜑})
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   ∨ wo 662   = wceq 1285   ∈ wcel 1434  {cab 2068  {crab 2353   ∪ cun 2972 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2064 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1288  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1687  df-clab 2069  df-cleq 2075  df-clel 2078  df-nfc 2209  df-rab 2358  df-v 2604  df-un 2978 This theorem is referenced by: (None)
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator